|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-02-19 00:13:53
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Godmar Back wrote: > I have a program for which valgrind 2.1.0 flags a deadlock condition > because it doesn't take into account that a sigitimer-delivered signal > will resume waiting threads in the future via sem_post(). It seems to > me that valgrind should be more conservative in bailing when signals > are involved, or provide an option to turn deadlock detection off. > > My question is whether there is such an option in valgrind? Not that I know of. But if you try the CVS HEAD, we now use the native pthread library rather than our own, so the problem might go away. N |