|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2004-08-20 08:40:23
|
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > btw, ever thought about valgrinding valgrind (which valgrinds another > valgrind :)? Sure, it's the first thing everyone tries :) > with a dynamic load address this shouldn't be a major problem any more. > ok, for me, even the most trivial "valgrind valgrind" just segfaults, > but i suppose this is easily fixable. I don't think it's that easy. Then again, I'd be happy to be proven wrong, patches are welcome :) I once had self-hosting briefly working in the LD_PRELOAD days, by statically linking V with a program, and then running that combination under another V. There were difficulties with the inner V doing clever things that fooled the outer V and gave spurious errors. I didn't do much with it, and then we switched to FV and that stopped working. N |