=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp 2016-10-25 02:59:17.683889436 +0100
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:13:45.833417728 +0100
@@ -35,4 +35,75 @@
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
-ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+drd: drd_barrier.c:352 (vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait): Assertion 'p' failed.
+
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait (drd_barrier.c:?)
+ by 0x........: handle_client_request (drd_clientreq.c:?)
+ by 0x........: wrap_tool_handle_client_request (m_tooliface.c:?)
+ by 0x........: do_client_request (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_scheduler (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_wrapper (syswrap-linux.c:103)
+ by 0x........: run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:156)
+ by 0x........: vgModuleLocal_start_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:325)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgtest-10398/2016-10-25/valgrind-new/drd/drd-amd64-linux)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=4
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Yielding (lwpid 21047)
+ at 0x........: __lll_lock_wait (lowlevellock.S:131)
+ by 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (pthread_barrier_destroy.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:?)
+
+Thread 2: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21053)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 3: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21054)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 4: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 21244)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: sleep1 (bar_bad.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+
+Thread 5: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21246)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 6: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21458)
+ at 0x........: ??? (syscall-template.S:81)
+ by 0x........: sleep (sleep.c:?)
+ by 0x........: exit1 (bar_bad.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+
+
+Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution.
+It contains workarounds to several common problems.
+In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after
+identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance
+that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or
+crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c.
+
+If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org
+
+In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind
+version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks.
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff-nohang
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp-nohang 2016-10-25 02:59:17.642890160 +0100
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:13:45.833417728 +0100
@@ -34,9 +34,76 @@
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
-Not a barrier
- at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+drd: drd_barrier.c:352 (vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait): Assertion 'p' failed.
+
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait (drd_barrier.c:?)
+ by 0x........: handle_client_request (drd_clientreq.c:?)
+ by 0x........: wrap_tool_handle_client_request (m_tooliface.c:?)
+ by 0x........: do_client_request (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_scheduler (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_wrapper (syswrap-linux.c:103)
+ by 0x........: run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:156)
+ by 0x........: vgModuleLocal_start_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:325)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgtest-10398/2016-10-25/valgrind-new/drd/drd-amd64-linux)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=4
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Yielding (lwpid 21047)
+ at 0x........: __lll_lock_wait (lowlevellock.S:131)
+ by 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (pthread_barrier_destroy.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:?)
+Thread 2: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21053)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 3: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21054)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 4: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 21244)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: sleep1 (bar_bad.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+
+Thread 5: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21246)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 6: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21458)
+ at 0x........: ??? (syscall-template.S:81)
+ by 0x........: sleep (sleep.c:?)
+ by 0x........: exit1 (bar_bad.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+
+
+Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution.
+It contains workarounds to several common problems.
+In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after
+identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance
+that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or
+crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c.
+
+If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org
+
+In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind
+version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks.
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp-solaris 2016-10-25 02:59:17.688889347 +0100
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:13:45.833417728 +0100
@@ -34,16 +34,76 @@
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
-Not a barrier
- at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:?)
-Destruction of barrier that is being waited upon: barrier 0x........
- at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:?)
-barrier 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_barrier_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+drd: drd_barrier.c:352 (vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait): Assertion 'p' failed.
+
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait (drd_barrier.c:?)
+ by 0x........: handle_client_request (drd_clientreq.c:?)
+ by 0x........: wrap_tool_handle_client_request (m_tooliface.c:?)
+ by 0x........: do_client_request (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_scheduler (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_wrapper (syswrap-linux.c:103)
+ by 0x........: run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:156)
+ by 0x........: vgModuleLocal_start_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:325)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgtest-10398/2016-10-25/valgrind-new/drd/drd-amd64-linux)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=4
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Yielding (lwpid 21047)
+ at 0x........: __lll_lock_wait (lowlevellock.S:131)
+ by 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (pthread_barrier_destroy.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:?)
+Thread 2: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21053)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 3: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21054)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 4: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 21244)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: sleep1 (bar_bad.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+
+Thread 5: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21246)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (pthread_barrier_wait.S:71)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+
+Thread 6: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 21458)
+ at 0x........: ??? (syscall-template.S:81)
+ by 0x........: sleep (sleep.c:?)
+ by 0x........: exit1 (bar_bad.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+
+
+Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution.
+It contains workarounds to several common problems.
+In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after
+identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance
+that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or
+crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c.
+
+If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org
+
+In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind
+version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks.
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bar_bad_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp 2016-10-25 02:59:17.695889224 +0100
+++ bar_bad_xml.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:14:00.981136354 +0100
@@ -204,32 +204,152 @@
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
+
-
- FINISHED
-
-
-
-
-
- ...
- 0x........
-
-
- ...
- 0x........
-
-
- ...
- 0x........
-
-
- ...
- 0x........
-
-
+drd: drd_barrier.c:352 (vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait): Assertion 'p' failed.
-...
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait (drd_barrier.c:?)
+ by 0x........: handle_client_request (drd_clientreq.c:?)
+ by 0x........: wrap_tool_handle_client_request (m_tooliface.c:?)
+ by 0x........: do_client_request (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_scheduler (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_wrapper (syswrap-linux.c:103)
+ by 0x........: run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:156)
+ by 0x........: vgModuleLocal_start_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:325)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgtest-10398/2016-10-25/valgrind-new/drd/drd-amd64-linux)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=4
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Yielding (lwpid 22829)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ pthread_barrier_destroy
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ main
+ ...
+ bar_bad.c
+ ...
+
+
+
+Thread 2: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 22836)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ sleep1
+ ...
+ bar_bad.c
+ ...
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ vgDrd_thread_wrapper
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+
+Thread 3: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 22837)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ vgDrd_thread_wrapper
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bar_bad_xml.stderr.diff-nohang
=================================================
--- bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp-nohang 2016-10-25 02:59:17.654889948 +0100
+++ bar_bad_xml.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:14:00.981136354 +0100
@@ -204,11 +204,31 @@
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
-
- 0x........
- ...
- GenericErr
- Not a barrier
+
+
+drd: drd_barrier.c:352 (vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait): Assertion 'p' failed.
+
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait (drd_barrier.c:?)
+ by 0x........: handle_client_request (drd_clientreq.c:?)
+ by 0x........: wrap_tool_handle_client_request (m_tooliface.c:?)
+ by 0x........: do_client_request (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_scheduler (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_wrapper (syswrap-linux.c:103)
+ by 0x........: run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:156)
+ by 0x........: vgModuleLocal_start_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:325)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgtest-10398/2016-10-25/valgrind-new/drd/drd-amd64-linux)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=4
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Yielding (lwpid 22829)
0x........
@@ -227,38 +247,109 @@
...
-
+
+Thread 2: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 22836)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ sleep1
+ ...
+ bar_bad.c
+ ...
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ vgDrd_thread_wrapper
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+
+Thread 3: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 22837)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ vgDrd_thread_wrapper
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+
+Thread 4: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 22852)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ pthread_barrier_wait
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ sleep1
+ ...
+ bar_bad.c
+ ...
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ vgDrd_thread_wrapper
+ ...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bar_bad_xml.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp-solaris 2016-10-25 02:59:17.701889118 +0100
+++ bar_bad_xml.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:14:00.981136354 +0100
@@ -204,11 +204,31 @@
destroy a barrier that was never initialised
-
- 0x........
- ...
- GenericErr
- Not a barrier
+
+
+drd: drd_barrier.c:352 (vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait): Assertion 'p' failed.
+
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_barrier_pre_wait (drd_barrier.c:?)
+ by 0x........: handle_client_request (drd_clientreq.c:?)
+ by 0x........: wrap_tool_handle_client_request (m_tooliface.c:?)
+ by 0x........: do_client_request (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_scheduler (scheduler.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_wrapper (syswrap-linux.c:103)
+ by 0x........: run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:156)
+ by 0x........: vgModuleLocal_start_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:325)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgtest-10398/2016-10-25/valgrind-new/drd/drd-amd64-linux)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=4
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Yielding (lwpid 22829)
0x........
@@ -227,89 +247,109 @@
...
-
-
- 0x........
- ...
- BarrierErr
- Destruction of barrier that is being waited upon: barrier 0x........
+Thread 2: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 22836)
0x........
...
- free
+ sleep1
...
- vg_replace_malloc.c
+ bar_bad.c
...
0x........
...
- main
+ vgDrd_thread_wrapper
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+
+Thread 3: status = VgTs_WaitSys (lwpid 22837)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ vgDrd_thread_wrapper
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+
+Thread 4: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 22852)
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ pthread_barrier_wait
+ ...
+ drd_pthread_intercepts.c
+ ...
+
+
+ 0x........
+ ...
+ sleep1
...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- preen_invars.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2016-10-25 02:59:13.857957006 +0100
+++ preen_invars.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:17:37.905112456 +0100
@@ -6,4 +6,46 @@
Actual: global array "im_a_global_arr" of size 10 in object with soname "preen_invars_so"
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+exp-sgcheck: sg_main.c:559 (add_blocks_to_StackTree): Assertion '!already_present' failed.
+
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:343)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:419)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:485)
+ by 0x........: add_blocks_to_StackTree (sg_main.c:559)
+ by 0x........: shadowStack_new_frame.isra.22 (sg_main.c:1883)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: _dl_sort_fini (dl-fini.c:41)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgdb-pipe-shared-mem-vgdb-19088-by-???-on-mock)
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=1
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 19088)
+ at 0x........: _dl_sort_fini (dl-fini.c:121)
+ by 0x........: _dl_close_worker.part.0 (dl-close.c:233)
+ by 0x........: _dl_close (dl-close.c:125)
+ by 0x........: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:187)
+ by 0x........: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:163)
+ by 0x........: dlclose (dlclose.c:46)
+ by 0x........: main (preen_invars.c:48)
+
+
+Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution.
+It contains workarounds to several common problems.
+In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after
+identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance
+that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or
+crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c.
+
+If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org
+
+In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind
+version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks.
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- preen_invars.stdout.exp 2016-10-25 02:59:13.855957041 +0100
+++ preen_invars.stdout.out 2016-10-25 03:17:35.409158379 +0100
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-foo bar 1
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2016-10-25 02:59:12.913973678 +0100
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2016-10-25 03:04:55.172791391 +0100
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@
test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/new-cpp.post.diff
=================================================
--- new-cpp.post.exp 2016-10-25 02:59:13.717959478 +0100
+++ new-cpp.post.out 2016-10-25 03:08:58.156602597 +0100
@@ -6,54 +6,60 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.21.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
+ 10 96,776 72,712 72,704 8 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2016-10-25 02:59:13.709959620 +0100
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2016-10-25 03:08:59.038587119 +0100
@@ -6,54 +6,60 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.21.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
+ 10 96,776 72,712 72,704 8 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp-mips32 2016-10-25 02:59:13.718959461 +0100
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2016-10-25 03:08:59.038587119 +0100
@@ -1,63 +1,65 @@
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Command: ./overloaded-new
-Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element
+Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element --ignore-fn=_GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc
ms_print arguments: massif.out
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
-| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
-| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
-| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
- ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.21.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp 2016-10-25 02:59:13.226968150 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:06:42.362933004 +0100
@@ -1,118 +1,118 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
-4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 163 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 56 bytes in 2 blocks
+ stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
- newarray : 28 bytes in 1 blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 bytes in 2 blocks
+ newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 115 (+115) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-115) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-56) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 111 (-4) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 52 (+4) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 108 (-3) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 55 (+3) bytes in 3 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 83 (-25) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 80 (+25) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 56 (+56) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-64bit
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit 2016-10-25 02:59:13.151969474 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:06:42.362933004 +0100
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 239 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 96 (-143) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 111 (+15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 79 (-32) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 128 (+49) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (-111) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
- still reachable: 239 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+111) bytes in 9 (+4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 239 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+0) bytes in 9 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 191 (+191) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-191) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,752 (-191) bytes in 3 (-6) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
@@ -133,10 +133,16 @@
Finished!
HEAP SUMMARY:
- in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- total heap usage: 9 allocs, 9 frees, 247 bytes allocated
+ in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
+ total heap usage: 10 allocs, 9 frees, 72,951 bytes allocated
-All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
+ suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-64bit-solaris
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris 2016-10-25 02:59:13.021971770 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:06:42.362933004 +0100
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 273 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 bytes in 2 blocks
+ stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 177 (+177) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 96 (-177) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 162 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 111 (+15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 194 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 79 (-32) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -61,10 +61,10 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 111 (-83) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 162 (+83) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+114) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (-111) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
- still reachable: 273 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+111) bytes in 9 (+4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 32 (+32) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+48) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
@@ -88,9 +88,9 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 273 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+0) bytes in 9 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
newarray : 32 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -101,10 +101,10 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 225 (+225) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-225) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ possibly lost: 191 (+191) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,752 (-191) bytes in 3 (-6) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris 2016-10-25 02:59:13.523962904 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 03:06:42.362933004 +0100
@@ -1,118 +1,118 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
-4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 197 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 90 bytes in 2 blocks
+ stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
- newarray : 28 bytes in 1 blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 bytes in 2 blocks
+ newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 149 (+149) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-149) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-90) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 145 (-4) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 52 (+4) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 142 (-3) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 55 (+3) bytes in 3 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 83 (-59) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 114 (+59) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 90 (+90) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64
=================================================
./valgrind-old/exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- preen_invars.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2016-10-25 02:40:35.808831340 +0100
+++ preen_invars.stderr.out 2016-10-25 02:59:02.095164750 +0100
@@ -6,4 +6,46 @@
Actual: global array "im_a_global_arr" of size 10 in object with soname "preen_invars_so"
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+exp-sgcheck: sg_main.c:559 (add_blocks_to_StackTree): Assertion '!already_present' failed.
+
+host stacktrace:
+ at 0x........: show_sched_status_wrk (m_libcassert.c:343)
+ by 0x........: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:419)
+ by 0x........: vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:485)
+ by 0x........: add_blocks_to_StackTree (sg_main.c:559)
+ by 0x........: shadowStack_new_frame.isra.22 (sg_main.c:1883)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: _dl_sort_fini (dl-fini.c:41)
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /tmp/vgdb-pipe-shared-mem-vgdb-9449-by-???-on-mock)
+ by 0x........: ???
+
+sched status:
+ running_tid=1
+
+Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable (lwpid 9449)
+ at 0x........: _dl_sort_fini (dl-fini.c:121)
+ by 0x........: _dl_close_worker.part.0 (dl-close.c:233)
+ by 0x........: _dl_close (dl-close.c:125)
+ by 0x........: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:187)
+ by 0x........: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:163)
+ by 0x........: dlclose (dlclose.c:46)
+ by 0x........: main (preen_invars.c:48)
+
+
+Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution.
+It contains workarounds to several common problems.
+In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after
+identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance
+that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or
+crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c.
+
+If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org
+
+In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind
+version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks.
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- preen_invars.stdout.exp 2016-10-25 02:40:35.807831359 +0100
+++ preen_invars.stdout.out 2016-10-25 02:58:59.502210544 +0100
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-foo bar 1
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2016-10-25 02:40:34.850848979 +0100
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2016-10-25 02:46:11.692655901 +0100
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@
test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
=================================================
./valgrind-old/massif/tests/new-cpp.post.diff
=================================================
--- new-cpp.post.exp 2016-10-25 02:40:35.664833992 +0100
+++ new-cpp.post.out 2016-10-25 02:50:11.428106214 +0100
@@ -6,54 +6,60 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.21.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
+ 10 96,776 72,712 72,704 8 0
=================================================
./valgrind-old/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2016-10-25 02:40:35.655834158 +0100
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2016-10-25 02:50:12.330086995 +0100
@@ -6,54 +6,60 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.21.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
+ 10 96,776 72,712 72,704 8 0
=================================================
./valgrind-old/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp-mips32 2016-10-25 02:40:35.665833974 +0100
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2016-10-25 02:50:12.330086995 +0100
@@ -1,63 +1,65 @@
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Command: ./overloaded-new
-Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element
+Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element --ignore-fn=_GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc
ms_print arguments: massif.out
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
-| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
-| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
-| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
- ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (dl-init.c:30)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.21.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp 2016-10-25 02:40:35.176842977 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 02:47:57.061694276 +0100
@@ -1,118 +1,118 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
-4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 163 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 56 bytes in 2 blocks
+ stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
- newarray : 28 bytes in 1 blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 bytes in 2 blocks
+ newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 115 (+115) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-115) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-56) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 111 (-4) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 52 (+4) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 108 (-3) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 55 (+3) bytes in 3 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 83 (-25) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 80 (+25) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 56 (+56) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-64bit
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit 2016-10-25 02:40:35.101844358 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 02:47:57.061694276 +0100
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 239 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 96 (-143) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 111 (+15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 79 (-32) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 128 (+49) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (-111) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
- still reachable: 239 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+111) bytes in 9 (+4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 239 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+0) bytes in 9 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 191 (+191) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-191) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,752 (-191) bytes in 3 (-6) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
@@ -133,10 +133,16 @@
Finished!
HEAP SUMMARY:
- in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- total heap usage: 9 allocs, 9 frees, 247 bytes allocated
+ in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
+ total heap usage: 10 allocs, 9 frees, 72,951 bytes allocated
-All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
+ suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-64bit-solaris
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris 2016-10-25 02:40:34.942847285 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 02:47:57.061694276 +0100
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 273 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 bytes in 2 blocks
+ stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 177 (+177) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 96 (-177) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 162 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 111 (+15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 194 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 79 (-32) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -61,10 +61,10 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 111 (-83) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 162 (+83) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+114) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (-111) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
- still reachable: 273 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+111) bytes in 9 (+4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 32 (+32) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+48) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
@@ -88,9 +88,9 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 273 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 (+0) bytes in 9 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
newarray : 32 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -101,10 +101,10 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 225 (+225) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-225) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ possibly lost: 191 (+191) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,752 (-191) bytes in 3 (-6) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris 2016-10-25 02:40:35.472837527 +0100
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-25 02:47:57.061694276 +0100
@@ -1,118 +1,118 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
-4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 197 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,943 bytes in 9 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 90 bytes in 2 blocks
+ stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
- newarray : 28 bytes in 1 blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 bytes in 2 blocks
+ newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 149 (+149) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-149) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,800 (-143) bytes in 5 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-90) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 145 (-4) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 52 (+4) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,815 (+15) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 142 (-3) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 55 (+3) bytes in 3 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-32) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 83 (-59) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 114 (+59) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,832 (+49) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 90 (+90) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64