================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-03-17 03:55:18.386827002 +0100 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 04:05:00.746836020 +0100 @@ -7,28 +7,20 @@ by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86 ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-03-17 03:55:18.396827003 +0100 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 04:05:00.746836020 +0100 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) @@ -16,19 +16,11 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-03-17 03:55:18.386827002 +0100 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 04:05:03.846836330 +0100 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-03-17 03:55:18.356826999 +0100 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 04:05:03.846836330 +0100 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-03-17 03:55:18.376827001 +0100 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 04:05:03.846836330 +0100 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-03-17 03:55:16.216826785 +0100 +++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-03-17 04:02:11.636832654 +0100 @@ -18,13 +18,5 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34) ----------------------------------------------------------------- -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37) - - -ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-03-17 03:55:16.216826785 +0100 +++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-03-17 04:02:16.796833105 +0100 @@ -215,14 +215,6 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242) ----------------------------------------------------------------- - -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245) - FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post @@ -235,4 +227,4 @@ ... -ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/test-plo-yes.stderr.diff-le32 ================================================= --- test-plo-yes.stderr.exp-le32 2012-03-17 03:55:16.876826851 +0100 +++ test-plo-yes.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:59:19.456828333 +0100 @@ -1 +1,12 @@ -XXX put 32 bit results in here +Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) + ... + +Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) + ... + +Invalid read of size 8 + ... + Address 0x........ is 8 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd + at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) + ... + ================================================= ./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/test-plo-yes.stderr.diff-le64 ================================================= --- test-plo-yes.stderr.exp-le64 2012-03-17 03:55:16.886826852 +0100 +++ test-plo-yes.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:59:19.456828333 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ... +Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) + ... + Invalid read of size 8 ... Address 0x........ is 8 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-03-17 03:45:06.286827466 +0100 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:54:49.056834752 +0100 @@ -7,28 +7,20 @@ by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86 ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-03-17 03:45:06.296827467 +0100 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:54:49.056834752 +0100 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) @@ -16,19 +16,11 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-03-17 03:45:06.286827466 +0100 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:54:52.156835062 +0100 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-03-17 03:45:06.256827463 +0100 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:54:52.156835062 +0100 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-03-17 03:45:06.276827465 +0100 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:54:52.156835062 +0100 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-03-17 03:45:04.126827250 +0100 +++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:51:59.696831232 +0100 @@ -18,13 +18,5 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34) ----------------------------------------------------------------- -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37) - - -ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-03-17 03:45:04.116827249 +0100 +++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:52:04.846831667 +0100 @@ -215,14 +215,6 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242) ----------------------------------------------------------------- - -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245) - FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post @@ -235,4 +227,4 @@ ... -ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/test-plo-yes.stderr.diff-le32 ================================================= --- test-plo-yes.stderr.exp-le32 2012-03-17 03:45:04.736827311 +0100 +++ test-plo-yes.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:49:07.736826888 +0100 @@ -1 +1,12 @@ -XXX put 32 bit results in here +Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) + ... + +Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) + ... + +Invalid read of size 8 + ... + Address 0x........ is 8 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd + at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) + ... + ================================================= ./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/test-plo-yes.stderr.diff-le64 ================================================= --- test-plo-yes.stderr.exp-le64 2012-03-17 03:45:04.756827313 +0100 +++ test-plo-yes.stderr.out 2012-03-17 03:49:07.736826888 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ... +Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) + ... + Invalid read of size 8 ... Address 0x........ is 8 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd