=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/annotate_barrier_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- annotate_barrier_xml.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:55:47.140228042 +0200
+++ annotate_barrier_xml.stderr.out 2011-10-19 22:03:30.740227900 +0200
@@ -189,9 +189,6 @@
0x........
...
start_thread
-
...
- pthread_create.c
- ...
Address 0x........ is at offset 0 from 0x.........
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:55:47.120228040 +0200
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-19 22:06:03.630229445 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:55:47.130228041 +0200
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-19 22:06:07.110229699 +0200
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-19 21:55:47.140228042 +0200
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-19 22:06:07.110229699 +0200
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:55:40.870227415 +0200
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-19 22:03:12.020226820 +0200
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:55:40.860227414 +0200
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-19 22:03:17.300227265 +0200
@@ -215,14 +215,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +227,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:55:42.400227568 +0200
+++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:58:45.420233637 +0200
@@ -6,45 +6,7 @@
---------------------------------------
relative timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ...
-sleeping one second ...
-timerfd_gettime returned:
- it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1
-sleeping 1 second ...
-waiting timer ...
-got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
-O_NONBLOCK test ...
-waiting timer (flush the single tick) ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
-success
-
-
----------------------------------------
-| testing CLOCK REALTIME
----------------------------------------
-
-relative timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ...
-sleeping one second ...
-timerfd_gettime returned:
- it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1
-sleeping 1 second ...
-waiting timer ...
-got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
-O_NONBLOCK test ...
-waiting timer (flush the single tick) ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
-success
+timerfd_settime: Success
HEAP SUMMARY:
in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/annotate_barrier_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- annotate_barrier_xml.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:45:11.230225632 +0200
+++ annotate_barrier_xml.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:52:30.080232394 +0200
@@ -189,9 +189,6 @@
0x........
...
start_thread
- ...
- pthread_create.c
- ...
Address 0x........ is at offset 0 from 0x.........
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:45:11.210225630 +0200
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:55:11.990225324 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:45:11.220225631 +0200
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:55:15.470225580 +0200
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-19 21:45:11.230225632 +0200
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:55:15.470225580 +0200
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:45:04.920225001 +0200
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:52:11.370231309 +0200
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:45:04.920225001 +0200
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:52:16.640231750 +0200
@@ -215,14 +215,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +227,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2011-10-19 21:45:06.540225163 +0200
+++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2011-10-19 21:48:09.380231707 +0200
@@ -6,45 +6,7 @@
---------------------------------------
relative timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ...
-sleeping one second ...
-timerfd_gettime returned:
- it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1
-sleeping 1 second ...
-waiting timer ...
-got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
-O_NONBLOCK test ...
-waiting timer (flush the single tick) ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
-success
-
-
----------------------------------------
-| testing CLOCK REALTIME
----------------------------------------
-
-relative timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ...
-waiting timer ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s
-sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ...
-sleeping one second ...
-timerfd_gettime returned:
- it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1
-sleeping 1 second ...
-waiting timer ...
-got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s
-O_NONBLOCK test ...
-waiting timer (flush the single tick) ...
-got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s
-success
+timerfd_settime: Success
HEAP SUMMARY:
in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks