================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 22:04:40.000000000 +0200 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:18:56.000000000 +0200 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) @@ -16,19 +16,11 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 22:04:40.000000000 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:21:40.000000000 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-08 22:04:40.000000000 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:21:40.000000000 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 22:04:35.000000000 +0200 +++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:13:55.000000000 +0200 @@ -18,13 +18,5 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34) ----------------------------------------------------------------- -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37) - - -ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 22:04:34.000000000 +0200 +++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:14:03.000000000 +0200 @@ -215,14 +215,6 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242) ----------------------------------------------------------------- - -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245) - FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post @@ -235,4 +227,4 @@ ... -ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff ================================================= --- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 22:04:36.000000000 +0200 +++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:07:49.000000000 +0200 @@ -6,45 +6,7 @@ --------------------------------------- relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success - - ---------------------------------------- -| testing CLOCK REALTIME ---------------------------------------- - -relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success +timerfd_settime: Success HEAP SUMMARY: in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:12.000000000 +0200 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:00:20.000000000 +0200 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) @@ -16,19 +16,11 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:12.000000000 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:04:00.000000000 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-08 21:45:12.000000000 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:04:00.000000000 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcbreak.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mcbreak.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ mcbreak.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:46:30.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 vgdb-error value changed from 999999 to 0 n_errs_found 1 (vgdb-error 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:46:32.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 monitor command request to kill this process Remote connection closed ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcleak.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mcleak.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ mcleak.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:46:52.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ... at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mcmain_pic.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ mcmain_pic.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:46:54.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 Remote connection closed ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcvabits.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mcvabits.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ mcvabits.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:47:00.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 Address 0x........ len 10 addressable Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined" ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:47:04.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 general valgrind monitor commands: help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- nlpasssigalrm.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ nlpasssigalrm.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:47:10.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 Remote connection closed ================================================= ./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/nlsigvgdb.stderrB.diff ================================================= --- nlsigvgdb.stderrB.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.000000000 +0200 +++ nlsigvgdb.stderrB.out 2011-10-08 21:47:13.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ relaying data between gdb and process .... +1 rtld.c: No such file or directory. vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 gdbserver: continuing in 5000 ms ... gdbserver: continuing after wait ... ================================================= ./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:06.000000000 +0200 +++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:55:12.000000000 +0200 @@ -18,13 +18,5 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34) ----------------------------------------------------------------- -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37) - - -ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:06.000000000 +0200 +++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:55:20.000000000 +0200 @@ -215,14 +215,6 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242) ----------------------------------------------------------------- - -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245) - FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post @@ -235,4 +227,4 @@ ... -ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff ================================================= --- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:08.000000000 +0200 +++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:48:23.000000000 +0200 @@ -6,45 +6,7 @@ --------------------------------------- relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success - - ---------------------------------------- -| testing CLOCK REALTIME ---------------------------------------- - -relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success +timerfd_settime: Success HEAP SUMMARY: in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks