================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:58:48.580072834 +0200 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:08:58.100074919 +0200 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) @@ -16,19 +16,11 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:58:48.590072835 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:09:01.550075180 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-08 21:58:48.600072836 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:09:01.550075180 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:58:42.020072178 +0200 +++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:06:04.340071129 +0200 @@ -18,13 +18,5 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34) ----------------------------------------------------------------- -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37) - - -ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:58:42.010072177 +0200 +++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:06:09.550071565 +0200 @@ -215,14 +215,6 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242) ----------------------------------------------------------------- - -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245) - FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post @@ -235,4 +227,4 @@ ... -ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff ================================================= --- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:58:43.660072342 +0200 +++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2011-10-08 22:01:46.600078517 +0200 @@ -6,45 +6,7 @@ --------------------------------------- relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success - - ---------------------------------------- -| testing CLOCK REALTIME ---------------------------------------- - -relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success +timerfd_settime: Success HEAP SUMMARY: in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:12.330075678 +0200 +++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:58:14.590070212 +0200 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) @@ -16,19 +16,11 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46) by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38) - by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:12.340075679 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:58:18.040070472 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8 ================================================= --- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-08 21:45:12.350075680 +0200 +++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:58:18.040070472 +0200 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) + by 0x........: ??? mutex 0x........ was first observed at: at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) @@ -47,13 +47,5 @@ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) -Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1. - at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45) - by 0x........: (below main) -mutex 0x........ was first observed at: - at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?) - by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31) - by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) - -ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:05.630075008 +0200 +++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:54:35.330071733 +0200 @@ -18,13 +18,5 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34) ----------------------------------------------------------------- -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37) - - -ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff ================================================= --- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:05.630075008 +0200 +++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:54:40.530072165 +0200 @@ -215,14 +215,6 @@ by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242) ----------------------------------------------------------------- - -Thread #x's call to sem_post failed - with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument) - at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...) - by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245) - FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post @@ -235,4 +227,4 @@ ... -ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) +ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ================================================= ./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall.stderr.diff ================================================= --- timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp 2011-10-08 21:45:07.290075174 +0200 +++ timerfd-syscall.stderr.out 2011-10-08 21:48:10.380071220 +0200 @@ -6,45 +6,7 @@ --------------------------------------- relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success - - ---------------------------------------- -| testing CLOCK REALTIME ---------------------------------------- - -relative timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -absolute timer test (at 500 ms) ... -waiting timer ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.5 s -sequential timer test (100 ms clock) ... -sleeping one second ... -timerfd_gettime returned: - it_value = 0.1 it_interval = 0.1 -sleeping 1 second ... -waiting timer ... -got about 20 timer ticks after about 2s -O_NONBLOCK test ... -waiting timer (flush the single tick) ... -got timer ticks (1) after 0.1 s -success +timerfd_settime: Success HEAP SUMMARY: in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks