> There's none, but vanilla 2.6.10 has included UML support; I=20
> wouldn't call=20
> that trustworthy (especially from the "security" point of view).
> The amount of patches which went in for UML before 2.6.11 was=20
> released was so=20
> big, and they were so heavy, I never got around to releasing=20
> a -bs patch for=20
> That said, why do you need 2.6.10?=20
The kernel in-house we run our apps on is 2.6.10, and therefore I would
like to create a UML based on that.
Would it possible to provide a bs patch for 2.6.10
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.