On Tuesday 12 July 2005 18:45, Gaspar, Alessio (USF Lakeland) wrote:
> err... please read 2.6.12-bb2-skas0 in my previous post instead of
> 2.6.12-bs1-skas0. I did try too many patches lately :)
Granted, but what about using plain -bs1? SKAS0 is still development code (and
I'm not very acquainted with it), so I would avoid it in case of problems.
After that, UML has not a lovely relation with 2.6.10 and 2.6.9, so if you can
go to either 126.96.36.199 or 2.6.11 it would be mairveillous...
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.