Re: [uml-user] NFS client module missing?

[Jeff D. <jd...@ka...>]

cg...@cd... said:
> No. I'm using a chroot'ed setup (almost functioning, except for the
> bit that  UML doesn't announce the pts numbers it allocates), and I
> read that was good  enough. 

I find it much more convenient to attach them to host portals.

> Mounting tmpfs in the chroot'ed area is part of the setup I created.  

OK, that's good.

> (apart from disk writes but lets blame my box for the moment)

I've got plans for speeding up UML IO, so it will get better on the UML
side.

				Jeff