From: Linus T. <tor...@li...> - 2011-08-23 19:25:31
|
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hp...@zy...> wrote: > > We could drop that information in a metaregister. It's not backward > compatible, but at least it will be obvious when that information is > available and not. Well, seriously, UML already looks at the word at "ip-2" for other reasons. So it isn't like there is any point in adding more support to just give you that information in another form. Linus |