Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 0/2] ptrace_vm: ptrace for syscall emulation virtual machines

[Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gm...>]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>
>>
>>I have successfully tested my paches in various configurations:
>>- patched-kernel running patched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running unpatched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running umview
>>- patched-UML running umview
>>- UML on UML fails in the same way with and without the patch.
>>I am currently running the patched kernel on my laptop.
>
>Thanks, I will give them another testing soon...

Sorry for the long delay...

I reviewed the whole patch set again, and tested it on both i386
and x86_64, it looks very fine!! :-)

So I would like to see these patches to be merged.

Andrew, could you please take these two patches for us??

Thank you!

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 0/2] ptrace_vm: ptrace for syscall emulation virtual machines

[Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gm...>]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>
>>
>>I have successfully tested my paches in various configurations:
>>- patched-kernel running patched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running unpatched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running umview
>>- patched-UML running umview
>>- UML on UML fails in the same way with and without the patch.
>>I am currently running the patched kernel on my laptop.
>
>Thanks, I will give them another testing soon...

Sorry for the long delay...

I reviewed the whole patch set again, and tested it on both i386
and x86_64, it looks very fine!! :-)

So I would like to see these patches to be merged.

Andrew, could you please take these two patches for us??

Thank you!