From: Gerald R. <ri...@ec...> - 2005-04-13 08:59:17
|
Hi, > > > > Since I need to keep the SuSE kernel for the host system > for various > > > reasons, would it solve the problem, if I include the commandline > > > syemu patch in the guest kernel and start it with > nosysemu parameter? > > I'm almost sure an updated SuSE kernel would solve this. > > There are some uml updates for 9.2, not sure the (host) > sysemu fix is in the 9.2 update kernels though. > > 9.1 kernels are fine, these predate the sysemu support and > thus also don't include buggy sysemu support ;) > > 9.3 or a kernel-of-the-day > (http://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/i386/HEAD/) > should be fine as well. > Changeing the guest from 2.4.27-um1 (from sourceforge) to -bs1 (from ~blaisorblade) makes the guest kernel panic a little later, so it didn't solve my problem. But yesterday, I received the SuSE 9.3 update and with the 9.3 kernel both guest versions works again! Thanks Gerald |