Re: Re(4): [uml-user] Performance with 2.4/2.6 guest and tmpfs

[Christopher S. A. <ca...@th...>]

From: "Sebastian Paul Avarvarei"
> Unfortunately, SKAS is not an option in my case. The production server where
this will run (if I manage to get some more decent performance) uses RH Enterprise
and they insist on using the default kernels, with auto-updates etc.

Too bad.  I'd be very interested to see the benchmark against a SKAS enabled host
and UML.  Care to test it and post the results, just for kicks?

Also, you might find the SKAS3-as-a-module useful.

http://www.rogerbinns.com/modskas3/

I have no idea how incompatible it might be with RH's Enterprise kernel trickery,
but if it works, a module might be more palatable with this system's manager.

-Chris

PS - Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me.