From: David C <da...@ho...> - 2003-12-25 03:29:08
|
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 11:43 pm, Nikolaus Hammler wrote: [sni..] > niki@nobaq:~/uml # grep SKAS .config > CONFIG_MODE_SKAS=y > > So skas seems to be built into my uml. You need it built into the host, not the UML kernel. [sni..] > The second questions is: Has anybody tried UML with > the new 2.6.0 kernel? Does it work or are there > problems? Does it work either as host either > as UML (with patch)? Yes, it is possible to get 2.6 to work. Search the mailing list archives. > Third questions (OT): > > I compiled the modules bridge.o and tun.o on my > kernel 2.4.20. When I try to load bridge.o I > get this error message: > > root@nobaq:~ # modprobe bridge > /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/bridge/bridge.o: unresolved symbol > br_ioctl_hook > /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/bridge/bridge.o: unresolved symbol > br_handle_frame_hook > /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/bridge/bridge.o: insmod > /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/bridge/bridge.o failed > /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/bridge/bridge.o: insmod bridge failed > root@nobaq:~ # > > What's the happening here? I searched the whole kernel tree if I have > forgotten to load a module or depency although I made "make dep". > I could nowhere find the real definition of these two functions. > Just the prototypes and function pointers in if_bridge.h, > netsyms.c, br.c, br_input.c, br_private.c and dev.c Looks to me like the module hasn't compiled properly. Personally I compile it into the kernel instead of as a module, perhaps try that instead? David |