[uml-devel] Re: [PATCH] UML is not consistent with other ARCH's about errno

[Jeff D. <jd...@ad...>]

bla...@ya... said:
> I posted this patch some time ago, but it was hidden inside an
> unrelated  thread, then it seemed not to be noticed. So I'll repost it
> forever, like if  this were the main LKML.

Don't bother, I saved the first copy you sent.

> On the i386 arch(and I think others, too) the translation from  return
> value(of calls like open(), fork()...) to errno setting is done in
> include/asm-i386/unistd.h. 

This looks reasonable, but I'm going to stare at it some more before merging
it.

				Jeff