From: Alan M. <si...@ya...> - 2003-07-01 14:33:08
|
Hi Alan :-) --- "Ridgeway, Alan" <Ala...@ca...> wrote: > When you set your routing on the guest OS, make > sure you ponit it to the tap0 interface. Would you use the same tap0 interface for all UML's on the host machine, or would each UML have their own tapX interface for that? I am thinking each one would use the tap0 interface, as it would be just like the host machine's eth0, no? If each UML is using the tap0 interface, would it still be possible to track bandwidth, CPU, etc. using something like MRTG, or for that, would it be better to setup a unique tapX interface for each UML? Thanks. Alan Murrell <si...@ya...> ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca |