From: David C. <da...@da...> - 2003-04-04 00:15:39
|
Peter Bryant wrote: > Did you have to try anything different from 'normal' server tuning? As Steve said, it sounds as if this issue is down to you using disk, rather than tmpfs, for UML memory storage. > Are there patches or compile options one should look at when building the > UML or host kernel (I'm running the 2.4.20-3 UML patch). Not especially. Have you applied the skas patch to your host kernel? > And I'd be interested in the load and setup of your servers. e.g. number of > UMLs, host load, host type, what the UMLs are doing, etc. I'm running a dual 1Ghz PIII with 1.5Gb of RAM, which has around 25 UMLs running on it doing a variety of things. It is currently running with a load of 0.11. David -- David Coulson email: d...@vi... Linux Developer / web: http://davidcoulson.net/ Network Engineer phone: (216) 533-6967 |