Re: [uml-devel] UML honeypot

[Ian C. B. <icb...@nk...>]

On Thursday 31 October 2002 15:24, Jeff Dike wrote:
> t....@er... said:
> > I've even tried using the 'tmpfs'aproach. Have you any suggestions?
>
> It is slow.  Sorry.
>
> However, the skas rework I am finishing up provides probably close to a=
n
> order of magnitude improvement in jail performance.
>
> Wait a week or two for it to settle down, and you'll have honeypots whi=
ch
> are faster than current non-honeypot UMLs.

What compatibility issues might exist between SKAS mode and OpenMosix?

As "tt" threading moves to individual processes, what keeps UML images us=
ing=20
SKAS from balancing over an OpenMosix hardware cluster?

Perhaps it's a bit too obvious, but this would be true Linux clustering. =
I'm=20
incredibly excited by the prospect.

--=20
- Ian C. Blenke <icb...@nk...>

(This message bound by the following:
http://www.nks.net/email_disclaimer.html)