From: Jeff Dike <jdike@ka...> - 2002-07-30 15:22:11
> As a final year project i intend to port the UML to freeBSD UNIX.I
> would like to know the magnitude of labour involved i.e the difficulty
You're talking about x86 FreeBSD, right?
It should be reasonably straightforward. FreeBSD is reasonably close to
Linux in ways that matter to UML. The one major problem is FreeBSD's lack
of a PTRACE_SYSCALL equivalent, but that can be worked around.
> Also i need to know where to start from.
Get a UML pool, build it and see what breaks. Then start fixing it.
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@ka...> - 2002-07-30 18:48:00
> I would like to know which other ports will be challenging say a port
> to Windows.Please advice me on a good one which will be unique and
There is a Windows port underway which is making good progress. So, I think
it loses on uniqueness.
FreeBSD would be a good choice, actually. It's close enough to Linux to
make it realistic as a part-time project. It's also fairly interesting
since combining it with UML/ppc would give you UML on OS/X. If it's too
easy and you finish way ahead of time, resurrecting UML/ppc and bringing
UML up on Darwin would make a nice extension of the project.
From: Marius Bernklev <mariube@un...> - 2002-07-30 19:41:59
Jeff Dike <jdike@...> writes:
> adilger@... said:
>> I can't speak for Jeff, but UML for Windows would be amusing.
> So check out umlwin.sf.net and prepare to be amused :-)
The requested URL / was not found on this server.
Apache/1.3.26 Server at umlwin.sourceforge.net Port 80
A. Top posters.
Q. What is the most annoying thing on mailing lists?
From: Erik Paulson <epaulson@cs...> - 2002-07-30 19:46:37
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:41:34PM +0200, Marius Bernklev wrote:
> Jeff Dike <jdike@...> writes:
> > adilger@... said:
> >> I can't speak for Jeff, but UML for Windows would be amusing.
> > So check out umlwin.sf.net and prepare to be amused :-)
> Not Found
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.