Re: [Useq-users] balanced number of reads?

[David N. <dav...@gm...>]

Hmm, that's a bit worrying.  There's no need to balance reads with USeq.
This is internally controlled. More data should increase the number of
regions returned at a given FDR, not decrease it. Your result is rather odd?
Would you mind posting the data to a web accessible directory somewhere.
Label it chIP and Input and let me know what genome build it is, I'd like to
run some tests.

-cheers, D


On 1/5/11 3:41 PM, "Noboru Jo Sakabe" <ns...@uc...> wrote:

>     Hi David, I ran Useq on a sample that has a lot fewer reads than input.
>     I got very few peaks.
>     Then I balanced treatment and input, randomly selecting reads from
> input.
>     Then I got ~14k peaks at FDR 4%. QuEST had also found a similar
> number of peaks.
>     I know that balancing reads is an issue in MACS, I would like to
> know if this is also true for Useq. I believe it is, given my results,
> but could you comment on this?
>     Thank you!
> 
> noboru
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
> to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
> should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
> without downtime or disruption
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
> _______________________________________________
> Useq-users mailing list
> Use...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/useq-users