usbpicprog-technical

[Usbpicprog-technical] Compiling under Ubuntu 9.04

[Jasper W. <ja...@po...>]

Hi,

compiling fails with loads of wx includes/references errors, i have 2.8 
installed and that seems to be what configure.ac wants, but the web pages 
says it need wx2.9 - is that really true?

If i install the .deb and run it i get:

usbpicprog: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not found 
(required by usbpicprog)

Does anyone have 0.3.0 running under ubuntu?

-- 
[http://pointless.net/]                                   [0x2ECA0975]

Re: [Usbpicprog-technical] Compiling under Ubuntu 9.04

[Frans S. <fra...@gm...>]

Dear Jasper Wallace,

Thank you for reporting this. I have already installed ubuntu 9.10, 
which has the new glibc version. (Ubuntu 9.10 is going to be released 
next week). Ubuntu 9.10 is thus the system which I made the .deb package 
for.
If you want to build it yourself, you will have to install wx2.9 indeed. 
(It should be able to compile with wx2.8.10, but it doesn't run very nicely)
Thank you for reporting this issue, I will build a 9.04 version as well.

Frans Schreuder

Jasper Wallace wrote:
> Hi,
>
> compiling fails with loads of wx includes/references errors, i have 2.8 
> installed and that seems to be what configure.ac wants, but the web pages 
> says it need wx2.9 - is that really true?
>
> If i install the .deb and run it i get:
>
> usbpicprog: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not found 
> (required by usbpicprog)
>
> Does anyone have 0.3.0 running under ubuntu?
>
>   

Re: [Usbpicprog-technical] Compiling under Ubuntu 9.04

[Jasper W. <ja...@po...>]

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Frans Schreuder wrote:

> Dear Jasper Wallace,
> 
> Thank you for reporting this. I have already installed ubuntu 9.10, 
> which has the new glibc version. (Ubuntu 9.10 is going to be released 
> next week). Ubuntu 9.10 is thus the system which I made the .deb package 
> for.
> If you want to build it yourself, you will have to install wx2.9 indeed. 
> (It should be able to compile with wx2.8.10, but it doesn't run very nicely)
> Thank you for reporting this issue, I will build a 9.04 version as well.

No problem!

I installed wx-2.9.0 from source and compiled usbpicprog with it and it runs
fine. I was able to upgrade the firmware on the upp and reflash a 16f84a,
however it looks like it's not able to write the data area/eeprom on a
16f88. I'll look into it some more and get back to the list about it.

-- 
[http://pointless.net/]                                   [0x2ECA0975]

Re: [Usbpicprog-technical] Compiling under Ubuntu 9.04

[Frans S. <fra...@gm...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear Jasper Wallace,

I have built the .deb package (only i686 for now, I will do x86_64
later) on ubuntu 9.04 and it also appears to run well on 9.10.
I have updated the package in the download area!

Regards,

Frans Schreuder

Frans Schreuder wrote:
> Dear Jasper Wallace,
>
> Thank you for reporting this. I have already installed ubuntu 9.10,
>  which has the new glibc version. (Ubuntu 9.10 is going to be
> released next week). Ubuntu 9.10 is thus the system which I made
> the .deb package for. If you want to build it yourself, you will
> have to install wx2.9 indeed. (It should be able to compile with
> wx2.8.10, but it doesn't run very nicely) Thank you for reporting
> this issue, I will build a 9.04 version as well.
>
> Frans Schreuder
>
> Jasper Wallace wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> compiling fails with loads of wx includes/references errors, i
>> have 2.8 installed and that seems to be what configure.ac wants,
>> but the web pages says it need wx2.9 - is that really true?
>>
>> If i install the .deb and run it i get:
>>
>> usbpicprog: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not
>>  found (required by usbpicprog)
>>
>> Does anyone have 0.3.0 running under ubuntu?
>>
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrlbVgACgkQcY8HGIrVkF6T6wCglnV4TLATOFYA/FTcFpRnkMrL
pjMAnRzfvsVhFQTqiZUcfBMbcdPQPOiZ
=r9KY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Usbpicprog-technical] Compiling under Ubuntu 9.04

[Francesco M. <f18...@ya...>]

Hi Frans,

Jasper Wallace ha scritto:
> compiling fails with loads of wx includes/references errors, i have 2.8 
> installed and that seems to be what configure.ac wants, but the web pages 
> says it need wx2.9 - is that really true?
I think we should update configure.ac to require wx2.9 since now wx2.9.0 has 
been officially released since some time...

Francesco




Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
--- configure.ac        (revisione 750)
+++ configure.ac        (copia locale)
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
  #
  # check for wxWidgets
  #
-WX_CONFIG_CHECK([2.8.0], [has_wxWin=1])
+WX_CONFIG_CHECK([2.9.0], [has_wxWin=1])
  if test "$has_wxWin" != 1; then
      AC_MSG_ERROR([
         wxWidgets must be installed on your system
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
         Please check that wx-config is in path, the directory
         where wxWidgets libraries are installed (returned by
        'wx-config --libs' command) is in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or
-       equivalent variable and wxWidgets version is 2.8.0 or above.
+       equivalent variable and wxWidgets version is 2.9.0 or above.
      ])
  fi




-- 

Re: [Usbpicprog-technical] Compiling under Ubuntu 9.04

[Frans S. <fra...@gm...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Francesco,

You are right about this, I updated configure.ac

Frans

Francesco Montorsi wrote:
> Hi Frans,
>
> Jasper Wallace ha scritto:
>> compiling fails with loads of wx includes/references errors, i
>> have 2.8 installed and that seems to be what configure.ac wants,
>> but the web pages says it need wx2.9 - is that really true?
> I think we should update configure.ac to require wx2.9 since now
> wx2.9.0 has been officially released since some time...
>
> Francesco
>
>
>
>
> Index: configure.ac
> ===================================================================
>  --- configure.ac        (revisione 750) +++ configure.ac
> (copia locale) @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ # # check for wxWidgets #
> -WX_CONFIG_CHECK([2.8.0], [has_wxWin=1]) +WX_CONFIG_CHECK([2.9.0],
> [has_wxWin=1]) if test "$has_wxWin" != 1; then AC_MSG_ERROR([
> wxWidgets must be installed on your system @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Please
> check that wx-config is in path, the directory where wxWidgets
> libraries are installed (returned by 'wx-config --libs' command) is
> in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or -       equivalent variable and wxWidgets
> version is 2.8.0 or above. +       equivalent variable and
> wxWidgets version is 2.9.0 or above. ]) fi
>
>
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrlbcAACgkQcY8HGIrVkF7ZiwCcDJrR6kq44IvM4IcWOK2P+y8h
uUEAn3t/PMAroxgUML9H54CvX8UBvTOh
=+mRO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----