You can subscribe to this list here.
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(23) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(14) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(17) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2013-03-11 20:28:19
|
Dear Marcelo Maggi, The windows 8 version needs a different driver topology. It is currently in development and it needs a lot more work. I am working on it but i am also busy because i recently moved into a new house. I believe that the bootloader works, but the normal operation still needs some debugging. Kind regards, Frans Schreuder Op 11 mrt. 2013 20:14 schreef "Marcelo Maggi" <mm...@ho...> het volgende: > Dear all, > > I have been using the programmer with Windows 7 (64) for quite a while > with no issues at all. I recently migrated to Windows 8 (64), and tried to > reinstall the software. > > The new version (UsbPicProg-amd64-0.5.0-win8.exe<http://usbpicprog.org/downloads/UsbPicProg-amd64-0.5.0-win8.exe>) > installs with no problems; however, Windows 8 will not recognize the > hardware, since there are no drivers available. Using the drivers from the > Windows 7 version (UsbPicProg-amd64-0.5.0.exe<http://usbpicprog.org/downloads/old/UsbPicProg-amd64-0.5.0.exe>), > and performing a manual driver update, Windows 8 will indicate that the > drivers are not signed, so they are not updated. In order to install these > drivers, the validation of driver signature in Windows 8 must be temporary > disabled, which will allow the driver update process to continue. > > Now the hardware will be recognized, no issues highlighted in the Windows > Device Manager, and when the UsbPicProg software runs the programmer is > identified (firmware version 0.5.0). > > The problem now arises when trying to Program, Read or Verify... clicking > any of these options, the program will stop running, with the usual Windows > message... "This program stopped working..." > > It happens all the time, and I have no solution so far... I tried > uninstalling and reinstalling, with the same results. I also tried running > the program in Compatibility Mode and as Administrator, without success. > > I would appreciate any help to solve this problem. > > Thank you. > > Best regards, > Marcelo Maggi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester > Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the > endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to > tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > |
From: Marcelo M. <mm...@ho...> - 2013-03-11 19:14:09
|
Dear all, I have been using the programmer with Windows 7 (64) for quite a while with no issues at all. I recently migrated to Windows 8 (64), and tried to reinstall the software. The new version (UsbPicProg-amd64-0.5.0-win8.exe) installs with no problems; however, Windows 8 will not recognize the hardware, since there are no drivers available. Using the drivers from the Windows 7 version (UsbPicProg-amd64-0.5.0.exe), and performing a manual driver update, Windows 8 will indicate that the drivers are not signed, so they are not updated. In order to install these drivers, the validation of driver signature in Windows 8 must be temporary disabled, which will allow the driver update process to continue. Now the hardware will be recognized, no issues highlighted in the Windows Device Manager, and when the UsbPicProg software runs the programmer is identified (firmware version 0.5.0). The problem now arises when trying to Program, Read or Verify... clicking any of these options, the program will stop running, with the usual Windows message... "This program stopped working..." It happens all the time, and I have no solution so far... I tried uninstalling and reinstalling, with the same results. I also tried running the program in Compatibility Mode and as Administrator, without success. I would appreciate any help to solve this problem. Thank you. Best regards,Marcelo Maggi |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2013-02-18 13:11:19
|
Hi Trevor, In that case I will just try to work on it. The xml files were taken from piklab, they have added the user id's. I have never really cared about them but it seems that people are actually using them, so I am going to add it! Frans On 02/18/2013 01:42 PM, Trevor Hinkley wrote: > Hi Frans, > > My hack is a horrible hack. I've hardcoded the user ID memory location > for the 18F4685 (0x200000-0x200007) into the write routine (so its not > something that should be committed). However, I can say that > TYPE_CODE for the read/writeBlock works for these values (at least on > the 18F4685). > > Since the values do seem to be stored in the XML files (memory > name="user_ids"), I'm quite happy to code this up into something more > general, since it will only take a few mods to the Hardware and HexFile > classes. At the moment I only have this model of MCU to work > with though, so I'm unable to do extensive testing. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, > is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought > leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, > whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most > recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical |
From: Trevor H. <tre...@gl...> - 2013-02-18 12:45:19
|
Hi Frans, My hack is a horrible hack. I've hardcoded the user ID memory location for the 18F4685 (0x200000-0x200007) into the write routine (so its not something that should be committed). However, I can say that TYPE_CODE for the read/writeBlock works for these values (at least on the 18F4685). Since the values do seem to be stored in the XML files (memory name="user_ids"), I'm quite happy to code this up into something more general, since it will only take a few mods to the Hardware and HexFile classes. At the moment I only have this model of MCU to work with though, so I'm unable to do extensive testing. |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2013-02-17 22:44:41
|
Dear Trevor, You are right, user id memory is not implemented in usbpicprog. Would you like to contribute your fix to the project? I can give you write access to the github repository. The change to the software won't be that big indeed, i will have a look at it. Frans Op 17 feb. 2013 23:41 schreef "Trevor Hinkley" < Tre...@gl...> het volgende: > I've just spent the weekend trying to burn an 18F4685 with the midibox > firmware. It seems a minor omission (with regards to this project) in the > usbpicprog software is that it ignores the User ID data, which this > firmware uses. In addition, I've been completely unable to run version 0.5 > software on MacOS 10.8.2, having to fall back to the 0.45 software (which > works perfectly apart from the missing feature). Since the ID memory > locations ARE listed in the XML files for the PIC models, it seems this > should be an easy fix (indeed I was able to put a simple hack in [just for > this model] to get it to write the ID data, in about 15 minutes for the > command-line). > > Cheers, > Trev > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, > is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly > thought > leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, > whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most > recent posts - join the conversation now. > http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > |
From: Trevor H. <Tre...@gl...> - 2013-02-17 22:18:30
|
I've just spent the weekend trying to burn an 18F4685 with the midibox firmware. It seems a minor omission (with regards to this project) in the usbpicprog software is that it ignores the User ID data, which this firmware uses. In addition, I've been completely unable to run version 0.5 software on MacOS 10.8.2, having to fall back to the 0.45 software (which works perfectly apart from the missing feature). Since the ID memory locations ARE listed in the XML files for the PIC models, it seems this should be an easy fix (indeed I was able to put a simple hack in [just for this model] to get it to write the ID data, in about 15 minutes for the command-line). Cheers, Trev |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2013-02-17 01:26:09
|
Dear Juan Malero, Don't worry too much about the capacitors. As long as they have the right value and the right voltage rating they will work. Good luck building usbpicprog! Frans Op 17 feb. 2013 02:20 schreef "Juan Molero" <jua...@gm...> het volgende: > Hello, I'm electronics engineering student from venezuela. > > I have some questions regarding the components for assembling the thorough > hole version of usbpicprog. > > I have almost no knowledge about packages, types of compoments, I just > need a simple pic programmer an this one looked like a good one but I'm > kinda starting to get worried when i get to solder all the componens into > the pcb, I have bought the 18f already so pretty much I dont want to give > up now. > > My doubts are in the capacitors, I just went to my local electronics store > and bought all the capacitors listed in the bill of materials but just > asking for the capacitance, i bought some tiny ceramic ones, some > electrolitic, but after checking the picture of the pcb hole posted on your > website I noticed some unknown rectangular white capacitors which made me > worry, will any kind of capacitor work? > > Maybe I'm thinking too much about it but I dont want to waste my money, > > Thanks for your responses > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, > is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly > thought > leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, > whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most > recent posts - join the conversation now. > http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > |
From: Juan M. <jua...@gm...> - 2013-02-17 01:19:58
|
Hello, I'm electronics engineering student from venezuela. I have some questions regarding the components for assembling the thorough hole version of usbpicprog. I have almost no knowledge about packages, types of compoments, I just need a simple pic programmer an this one looked like a good one but I'm kinda starting to get worried when i get to solder all the componens into the pcb, I have bought the 18f already so pretty much I dont want to give up now. My doubts are in the capacitors, I just went to my local electronics store and bought all the capacitors listed in the bill of materials but just asking for the capacitance, i bought some tiny ceramic ones, some electrolitic, but after checking the picture of the pcb hole posted on your website I noticed some unknown rectangular white capacitors which made me worry, will any kind of capacitor work? Maybe I'm thinking too much about it but I dont want to waste my money, Thanks for your responses |
From: Will M. <wm-...@sw...> - 2013-01-29 17:02:40
|
Hi Frans, Thanks for you interest! The raspberry Pi output is 3.3V (according to http://elinux.org/RPi_Low-level_peripherals, and confirmed with oscilloscope if I recall correctly) From my reading of the Programming spec, I can't find any mention of a 12V VPP, just a 3.3V on 'VDD during programming' in the table in section 7.0. The chip also has an internal voltage regulator to ramp the 3.3V on VDD to 2.5V needed on 'VDDcore' with an extra tantalum capacitor. Programming Spec: http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/39934b.pdf I'm quoting sources not because I want to prove my point, but because I don't know what's wrong and you may be able to explain - if one of my sources is inaccurate that would explain a lot! Those two bits put together made me think it would be very easy to use a Pi for this project - almost no extra components required. Will. P.S. In case you want to read more, here is a link to the Microchip page for this Pic. ;) http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/Devices.aspx?dDocName=en536119#documentation P.P.S. If you would like me to try and compile USB PIC Prog on the Pi, I shall try it some evening this week, but unfortunately I don't have a programmer to test it with. On 29/01/13 16:33, Frans Schreuder wrote: > Hi Will McElderry, > > It sounds nice, but how do you plan to convert the voltages (5V -> 3.3V) > and how do you supply the 12V programming voltage? > I guess you will need some additional hardware. > It is possible though to run usbpicprog on the raspberry pi. > > Regards, > > Frans > On 01/29/2013 01:33 PM, Will McElderry wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm attempting to use the GPIO pins on the Raspberry Pi to program a >> PIC24FJ32GB004, and struggling. >> >> I've had some success, but I can only clock out 0's from the Visi >> register (see note below). >> >> I am hoping that someone on here may be interested in my goal enough to >> lend me their knowledge and perhaps try running the code on their Pi to >> program a chip? >> >> Any comments on what may be wrong or ways to test further would be >> appreciated! >> >> The code is very basic and hacked together, it's C++ and easy enough to >> read. I've compared with the usbpicprog code and I can't see any >> noticeable differences. >> >> I'll post more details if there's anyone interested. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Will McElderry. >> >> NB: I *believe* I am clocking out zeros from the register as PGD seems >> to accept current when the PIC should be transmitting data - indicating >> the PIC is intentionally holding the ping low. >> This was a fortuitous discovery thanks to only having access to an >> oscilloscope with one channel, and using a r/2r ladder to allow >> monitoring 3 pins at the same time. When PGD is not connected to either >> zero or one the output voltage on the channel changes noticeably, a >> state I have been able to induce intentionally by sending invalid >> commands to the PIC, or not requesting clocking out of the Visi >> register, but asking the Pi to try and read from the PGD pin. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, >> MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current >> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft >> MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Usbpicprog-technical mailing list >> Usb...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2013-01-29 16:34:10
|
Hi Will McElderry, It sounds nice, but how do you plan to convert the voltages (5V -> 3.3V) and how do you supply the 12V programming voltage? I guess you will need some additional hardware. It is possible though to run usbpicprog on the raspberry pi. Regards, Frans On 01/29/2013 01:33 PM, Will McElderry wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm attempting to use the GPIO pins on the Raspberry Pi to program a > PIC24FJ32GB004, and struggling. > > I've had some success, but I can only clock out 0's from the Visi > register (see note below). > > I am hoping that someone on here may be interested in my goal enough to > lend me their knowledge and perhaps try running the code on their Pi to > program a chip? > > Any comments on what may be wrong or ways to test further would be > appreciated! > > The code is very basic and hacked together, it's C++ and easy enough to > read. I've compared with the usbpicprog code and I can't see any > noticeable differences. > > I'll post more details if there's anyone interested. > > Thanks, > > Will McElderry. > > NB: I *believe* I am clocking out zeros from the register as PGD seems > to accept current when the PIC should be transmitting data - indicating > the PIC is intentionally holding the ping low. > This was a fortuitous discovery thanks to only having access to an > oscilloscope with one channel, and using a r/2r ladder to allow > monitoring 3 pins at the same time. When PGD is not connected to either > zero or one the output voltage on the channel changes noticeably, a > state I have been able to induce intentionally by sending invalid > commands to the PIC, or not requesting clocking out of the Visi > register, but asking the Pi to try and read from the PGD pin. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical |
From: Will M. <wm-...@sw...> - 2013-01-29 12:51:48
|
Hi All, I'm attempting to use the GPIO pins on the Raspberry Pi to program a PIC24FJ32GB004, and struggling. I've had some success, but I can only clock out 0's from the Visi register (see note below). I am hoping that someone on here may be interested in my goal enough to lend me their knowledge and perhaps try running the code on their Pi to program a chip? Any comments on what may be wrong or ways to test further would be appreciated! The code is very basic and hacked together, it's C++ and easy enough to read. I've compared with the usbpicprog code and I can't see any noticeable differences. I'll post more details if there's anyone interested. Thanks, Will McElderry. NB: I *believe* I am clocking out zeros from the register as PGD seems to accept current when the PIC should be transmitting data - indicating the PIC is intentionally holding the ping low. This was a fortuitous discovery thanks to only having access to an oscilloscope with one channel, and using a r/2r ladder to allow monitoring 3 pins at the same time. When PGD is not connected to either zero or one the output voltage on the channel changes noticeably, a state I have been able to induce intentionally by sending invalid commands to the PIC, or not requesting clocking out of the Visi register, but asking the Pi to try and read from the PGD pin. |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2013-01-21 11:53:29
|
Hi Balint, You could try a low voltage shottky diode for the VDD, in stead of 1n4148. That should do the job. Frans Op 1/21/2013 11:39 AM, Bálint Gyenes schreef: > Hi Frans, > > I have only a multimeter, the voltages on the VDD and VPP pins are > about 4,4V and about 12,3V during the programming process. > I found the VDD voltage low, so I drove the target PIC's VDD pin with > a 5V supply. On this way the VPP voltage remained about 12,3V. > > Best Regards, > Balint > > 2013/1/21, Frans Schreuder <fra...@gm...>: >> Hi Balint, >> >> I have never tested the 16F628, because it is obsolete but it' s >> follower the 16F628A should work. The 16F84A should also work but that >> one is very critical about the voltages. Could you measure VPP and VDD >> while programming? preferably with an oscilloscope, but if you don't >> have it try using a multimeter while the programming is in progress. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Frans >> >> Op 1/21/2013 10:01 AM, Bálint Gyenes schreef: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I build the through-hole version of the usbpicprog. Everything looks >>> fine, but when I try to program a PIC, I get this: >>> >>> Erasing before programming... >>> Erase OK >>> Write Code memory OK >>> Programming the data area of the PIC... >>> Write Data memory OK >>> Verifying all areas of the PIC... >>> Verify code failed at 0x0. Read: 0x00, Expected: 0x12 >>> Programming configuration area of the PIC... >>> Error programming config memory >>> >>> I tried it with two PICs, a 16F628 and a 16F84A, the programmer >>> detects both, but at programming the situation is the same. >>> I checked the circuit, it looks correct and the I/O test gives the >>> required voltages on every pins. >>> Could it be the problem that some of the mounted transistors >>> (bs170,bs250, bc547) can't provide enough current? >>> >>> Thanks for the reply. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Balint >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, >>> MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current >>> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft >>> MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Usbpicprog-technical mailing list >>> Usb...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, >> MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current >> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft >> MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 >> _______________________________________________ >> Usbpicprog-technical mailing list >> Usb...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical |
From: Bálint G. <gye...@gm...> - 2013-01-21 10:39:15
|
Hi Frans, I have only a multimeter, the voltages on the VDD and VPP pins are about 4,4V and about 12,3V during the programming process. I found the VDD voltage low, so I drove the target PIC's VDD pin with a 5V supply. On this way the VPP voltage remained about 12,3V. Best Regards, Balint 2013/1/21, Frans Schreuder <fra...@gm...>: > Hi Balint, > > I have never tested the 16F628, because it is obsolete but it' s > follower the 16F628A should work. The 16F84A should also work but that > one is very critical about the voltages. Could you measure VPP and VDD > while programming? preferably with an oscilloscope, but if you don't > have it try using a multimeter while the programming is in progress. > > Kind regards, > > Frans > > Op 1/21/2013 10:01 AM, Bálint Gyenes schreef: >> Hi, >> >> I build the through-hole version of the usbpicprog. Everything looks >> fine, but when I try to program a PIC, I get this: >> >> Erasing before programming... >> Erase OK >> Write Code memory OK >> Programming the data area of the PIC... >> Write Data memory OK >> Verifying all areas of the PIC... >> Verify code failed at 0x0. Read: 0x00, Expected: 0x12 >> Programming configuration area of the PIC... >> Error programming config memory >> >> I tried it with two PICs, a 16F628 and a 16F84A, the programmer >> detects both, but at programming the situation is the same. >> I checked the circuit, it looks correct and the I/O test gives the >> required voltages on every pins. >> Could it be the problem that some of the mounted transistors >> (bs170,bs250, bc547) can't provide enough current? >> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> Best Regards, >> Balint >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, >> MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current >> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft >> MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 >> _______________________________________________ >> Usbpicprog-technical mailing list >> Usb...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2013-01-21 09:06:08
|
Hi Balint, I have never tested the 16F628, because it is obsolete but it' s follower the 16F628A should work. The 16F84A should also work but that one is very critical about the voltages. Could you measure VPP and VDD while programming? preferably with an oscilloscope, but if you don't have it try using a multimeter while the programming is in progress. Kind regards, Frans Op 1/21/2013 10:01 AM, Bálint Gyenes schreef: > Hi, > > I build the through-hole version of the usbpicprog. Everything looks > fine, but when I try to program a PIC, I get this: > > Erasing before programming... > Erase OK > Write Code memory OK > Programming the data area of the PIC... > Write Data memory OK > Verifying all areas of the PIC... > Verify code failed at 0x0. Read: 0x00, Expected: 0x12 > Programming configuration area of the PIC... > Error programming config memory > > I tried it with two PICs, a 16F628 and a 16F84A, the programmer > detects both, but at programming the situation is the same. > I checked the circuit, it looks correct and the I/O test gives the > required voltages on every pins. > Could it be the problem that some of the mounted transistors > (bs170,bs250, bc547) can't provide enough current? > > Thanks for the reply. > > Best Regards, > Balint > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical |
From: Bálint G. <gye...@gm...> - 2013-01-21 09:02:00
|
Hi, I build the through-hole version of the usbpicprog. Everything looks fine, but when I try to program a PIC, I get this: Erasing before programming... Erase OK Write Code memory OK Programming the data area of the PIC... Write Data memory OK Verifying all areas of the PIC... Verify code failed at 0x0. Read: 0x00, Expected: 0x12 Programming configuration area of the PIC... Error programming config memory I tried it with two PICs, a 16F628 and a 16F84A, the programmer detects both, but at programming the situation is the same. I checked the circuit, it looks correct and the I/O test gives the required voltages on every pins. Could it be the problem that some of the mounted transistors (bs170,bs250, bc547) can't provide enough current? Thanks for the reply. Best Regards, Balint |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2012-10-28 17:47:57
|
Dear Nuno, That's right, I have forgotten to compile a new development version of the firmware, that is because nothing has changed in the firmware since the latest release (0.5.0) For now just ignore the warning, on the next upgrade I will put a devel version number in the firmware. Regards, Frans On 10/28/2012 06:32 PM, Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote: > On 10/28/2012 04:20 AM, Frans Schreuder wrote: >> Please also upgrade your wxwidgets from that ppa > Hi Frans, > > that did the trick, but now the software complains about the firmware > not being up to date. I used the firmware.hex file in > /usr/share/usbpicprog , but it doesn't seem to be the devel version. > > regards, > Nuno > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WINDOWS 8 is here. > Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. > Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. > http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ > join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical |
From: Nuno S. A. <nu...@ae...> - 2012-10-28 17:33:03
|
On 10/28/2012 04:20 AM, Frans Schreuder wrote: > Please also upgrade your wxwidgets from that ppa Hi Frans, that did the trick, but now the software complains about the firmware not being up to date. I used the firmware.hex file in /usr/share/usbpicprog , but it doesn't seem to be the devel version. regards, Nuno |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2012-10-28 08:20:31
|
Please also upgrade your wxwidgets from that ppa Op 28 okt. 2012 02:02 schreef "Nuno Sucena Almeida" <nu...@ae...> het volgende: > On 10/27/2012 06:50 PM, Frans Schreuder wrote: > > If you apt-get install the latest software from usbpicprog-devel it > should > > work now. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Frans Schreuder > > Thanks Frans, but it seems I still have the same issue: > > ~$ l /etc/apt/sources.list.d/fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-* > fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-devel-quantal.list > fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-stable-precise.list.distUpgrade > fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-stable-precise.list.save > > after a apt-get update && apt-get install usbpicprog i still get: > > ~$ usbpicprog > usbpicprog: error while loading shared libraries: > libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file > or directory > > cheers, > Nuno > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WINDOWS 8 is here. > Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. > Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. > http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ > join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > |
From: Nuno S. A. <nu...@ae...> - 2012-10-28 00:02:03
|
On 10/27/2012 06:50 PM, Frans Schreuder wrote: > If you apt-get install the latest software from usbpicprog-devel it should > work now. > > Kind regards, > > Frans Schreuder Thanks Frans, but it seems I still have the same issue: ~$ l /etc/apt/sources.list.d/fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-* fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-devel-quantal.list fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-stable-precise.list.distUpgrade fransschreuder1-usbpicprog-stable-precise.list.save after a apt-get update && apt-get install usbpicprog i still get: ~$ usbpicprog usbpicprog: error while loading shared libraries: libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory cheers, Nuno |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2012-10-27 22:50:30
|
Dear Nuno, Before trying to program it with the serial programmer, you can try to see if it works if you remove the select jumper, that should launch the bootloader mode. If you apt-get install the latest software from usbpicprog-devel it should work now. Kind regards, Frans Schreuder Op 27 okt. 2012 22:38 schreef "Nuno Sucena Almeida" <nu...@ae...> het volgende: > Hi, > > after upgrading from ubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 and running the install > script (ubuntu-install-script.sh) I get the following: > > ~$ usbpicprog > usbpicprog: error while loading shared libraries: > libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file > or directory > > I have so.3 though: > ~$ dpkg -S libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.3 > libwxgtk2.9-0: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.3 > libwxgtk2.9-0: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.3.0.0 > > Also, before upgrading to 12.10 a few weeks ago, I tried to run the > devel branch and update the firmware, without changing the jumpers, and > now the programmer is no longer recognized, lsusb doesn't show it anymore > :( > > At this precise moment I'm building the serial port programmer in > pic-icsp.jpg to try to "unbrick" it. > > regards, > Nuno > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WINDOWS 8 is here. > Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. > Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. > http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ > join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > |
From: Nuno S. A. <nu...@ae...> - 2012-10-27 21:12:42
|
On 10/27/2012 04:01 PM, Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote: > now the programmer is no longer recognized, lsusb doesn't show it anymore:( > > At this precise moment I'm building the serial port programmer in > pic-icsp.jpg to try to "unbrick" it. > > regards, > Nuno With respect to this, I recovered by going through the normal firmware upgrade, changing the pins this time, and the programmer is now working, although I had to manually install an older .deb file to be able to run the software. |
From: Nuno S. A. <nu...@ae...> - 2012-10-27 20:38:06
|
Hi, after upgrading from ubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 and running the install script (ubuntu-install-script.sh) I get the following: ~$ usbpicprog usbpicprog: error while loading shared libraries: libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I have so.3 though: ~$ dpkg -S libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.3 libwxgtk2.9-0: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.3 libwxgtk2.9-0: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.9.so.3.0.0 Also, before upgrading to 12.10 a few weeks ago, I tried to run the devel branch and update the firmware, without changing the jumpers, and now the programmer is no longer recognized, lsusb doesn't show it anymore :( At this precise moment I'm building the serial port programmer in pic-icsp.jpg to try to "unbrick" it. regards, Nuno |
From: Gábor H. <gab...@gm...> - 2012-10-18 07:29:58
|
Hi Frans. Thanks for the hint, to check this, I will have to build a charge pump, as you did in usbpicprog. Regards, Gabor On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Frans Schreuder <fra...@gm...>wrote: > Hi Gabor, > > It could also be the MCLRE bit, disabling the MCLR pin, this requires > another programming mode entry. > > Regards, > > Frans > > On 10/17/2012 09:00 AM, Gábor Hornyák wrote: > > Hi, > > I will check the specs, but I am afraid this is something different, > because I can not even read the config words, including the device ID, > which I assume should be readable even with code protection enabled. > > Thanks, > Gabor > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Frans Schreuder <fra...@gm... > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> You probagbly haven't bricked the pic but programmed the code proteection >> bits by accident. With these bits enabled it is also more difficult to eras >> the pic, check the programming specification for the procedure. >> >> Regards, >> >> Frans >> >> Op 16 okt. 2012 23:04 schreef "Gábor Hornyák" <gab...@gm...> >> het volgende: >> >> > >> > Hi Everyone, >> > >> > My question is not strictly related to usbpicprog, but I am hoping that >> someone here has faced similar issue. >> > As a 'side' project of an other project, I thought I create a simple >> programmer to PIC18F46K22 (I have a demo board with PIC18F45K22 equipped >> with bootloader, which I am using for programming). Everything went fine - >> I was able to read/write program memory and read config words - until I >> reached the point where config words had to be written. After I created it >> and tested with a PIC, it seems that I bricked the mcu, because from that >> point, I can not do anything with the PIC (always read zeroes for all >> addresses). >> > I don't know what could have went wrong, since config word programming >> differs only in a few things from program memory programming (which works >> fine, and the fact is that I actually seem to have bricked two PICs >> already). My concrete question is: could this problem have been caused by >> trying to write config BYTES separately (not as words)? Has anyone faced >> similar problem? >> > >> > Thanks and Regards, >> > Gabor >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >> > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >> > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list >> > Usb...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical >> > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct >> _______________________________________________ >> Usbpicprog-technical mailing list >> Usb...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > > > > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > |
From: Frans S. <fra...@gm...> - 2012-10-17 08:47:50
|
Hi Gabor, It could also be the MCLRE bit, disabling the MCLR pin, this requires another programming mode entry. Regards, Frans On 10/17/2012 09:00 AM, Gábor Hornyák wrote: > Hi, > > I will check the specs, but I am afraid this is something different, > because I can not even read the config words, including the device ID, > which I assume should be readable even with code protection enabled. > > Thanks, > Gabor > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Frans Schreuder > <fra...@gm... <mailto:fra...@gm...>> wrote: > > Hi, > > You probagbly haven't bricked the pic but programmed the code > proteection bits by accident. With these bits enabled it is also > more difficult to eras the pic, check the programming > specification for the procedure. > > Regards, > > Frans > > Op 16 okt. 2012 23:04 schreef "Gábor Hornyák" > <gab...@gm... <mailto:gab...@gm...>> het volgende: > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > My question is not strictly related to usbpicprog, but I am > hoping that someone here has faced similar issue. > > As a 'side' project of an other project, I thought I create a > simple programmer to PIC18F46K22 (I have a demo board with > PIC18F45K22 equipped with bootloader, which I am using for > programming). Everything went fine - I was able to read/write > program memory and read config words - until I reached the point > where config words had to be written. After I created it and > tested with a PIC, it seems that I bricked the mcu, because from > that point, I can not do anything with the PIC (always read zeroes > for all addresses). > > I don't know what could have went wrong, since config word > programming differs only in a few things from program memory > programming (which works fine, and the fact is that I actually > seem to have bricked two PICs already). My concrete question is: > could this problem have been caused by trying to write config > BYTES separately (not as words)? Has anyone faced similar problem? > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Gabor > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > > _______________________________________________ > > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > > Usb...@li... > <mailto:Usb...@li...> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > <mailto:Usb...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > > > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical |
From: Gábor H. <gab...@gm...> - 2012-10-17 07:01:02
|
Hi, I will check the specs, but I am afraid this is something different, because I can not even read the config words, including the device ID, which I assume should be readable even with code protection enabled. Thanks, Gabor On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Frans Schreuder <fra...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > You probagbly haven't bricked the pic but programmed the code proteection > bits by accident. With these bits enabled it is also more difficult to eras > the pic, check the programming specification for the procedure. > > Regards, > > Frans > > Op 16 okt. 2012 23:04 schreef "Gábor Hornyák" <gab...@gm...> het > volgende: > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > My question is not strictly related to usbpicprog, but I am hoping that > someone here has faced similar issue. > > As a 'side' project of an other project, I thought I create a simple > programmer to PIC18F46K22 (I have a demo board with PIC18F45K22 equipped > with bootloader, which I am using for programming). Everything went fine - > I was able to read/write program memory and read config words - until I > reached the point where config words had to be written. After I created it > and tested with a PIC, it seems that I bricked the mcu, because from that > point, I can not do anything with the PIC (always read zeroes for all > addresses). > > I don't know what could have went wrong, since config word programming > differs only in a few things from program memory programming (which works > fine, and the fact is that I actually seem to have bricked two PICs > already). My concrete question is: could this problem have been caused by > trying to write config BYTES separately (not as words)? Has anyone faced > similar problem? > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Gabor > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > > _______________________________________________ > > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > > Usb...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Usbpicprog-technical mailing list > Usb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical > > |