Re: [Usbpicprog-technical] new processor support

[Frans S. <fra...@gm...>]

Dear Nuno,

If the processors algorithm is already implemented in the firmware
(picfamily) it is an easy task.
In that case only an entry needs to be added to index.xml.
Adding new families to the firmware is not that easy to do, for that i a
affraid that you will need to read through the code. In that case it's
better to check out the new restructure_code branch

Kind regards,

Frans Schreuder
Op 21 apr. 2012 23:16 schreef "Nuno Sucena Almeida" <nu...@ae...>
het volgende:

> Hi,
>        what would be the way of adding support for a new processor? I
> checked
> the FAQ but didn't see it mentioned. I know that I can look at the
> source, but some step-by-step guidelines would be nice. I'm particularly
> interested in the 18F14K50 chip among others.
>
>        Another thing, I tried to program the "blinking led" example on a
> few
> different processors and noticed that the oscillator settings/selection
> seems to be somewhat wrong, although I didn't look at the source. I
> tried with 16F648A, 16F628A, 12F615, 12F675 at least.
>        Writing my own simple C code within mplabx made it work flawlessly.
>                        Cheers,
>                                Nuno
>
> --
> http://aeminium.org/nuno/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
> Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
> Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
> _______________________________________________
> Usbpicprog-technical mailing list
> Usb...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/usbpicprog-technical
>