From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2009-02-28 11:36:12
|
Hi, sorry for the long delay, but better late than never :) Frans Schreuder ha scritto: >>> I don't think it should be very different, do you have the latest firmware? >>> >> I should have the firmware 0.1.1; I'll see what happens with the firmware in trunk. >> > Yes, try that one... It's also compiled, so you can just load the hex > file... I'm successfully using UPP with PIC16F84 and the very latest trunk firmware since some week. I thought to report it here to close this thread :) >> good idea; I'm currently using a cable 27cm long. I'll try with a shorter one >> even if the electrical length of the cable at 8Mhz is about >> >> L = 0.27/37 = 0.0073 >> >> which I think could be considered negligible. >> > In terms of wavelength you are absolutely right, but what about inductance? > If we consider the wire to be 1.5nH per millimeter, you get something > like 400nH which will result in 20 Ohms reactance at 8MHz. Luckily the > programmer doesn't run at 8 MHz, but something closer to 1MHz, so this > wouldn't be a big problem, it's just a couple of ohms. Indeed, you're right. I'm used to think in terms of electrical lengths but I shouldn't have overlooked the wire inductance :) > But you shouldn't make them much longer than that! Ok! Francesco -- |