urlan-boron Mailing List for The Urlan Project (Page 4)
Brought to you by:
wickedsmoke
You can subscribe to this list here.
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
From: Peter W A W. <pet...@gm...> - 2010-09-04 03:36:27
|
I took a clone from gitorious this morning. The linker threw up 2 errors: Rodney:boron peter$ make Linking C shared library libboron.dylib Undefined symbols: "_boron_installThreadPort", referenced from: _cfunc_thread in boron.c.o "_port_thread", referenced from: _cfunc_thread in boron.c.o _boron_makeEnv in boron.c.o ld: symbol(s) not found collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libboron.0.1.8.dylib] Error 1 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/boron-lib.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 I searched the source but the only references I could find to _boron_installThreadPort and _port_thread were in the boron.c.o file. Regards Peter |
From: Karl R. <kro...@sa...> - 2010-09-02 08:22:26
|
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:46:28 pm Peter W A Wood wrote: > I have ported my simple-test unit testing framework to boron. Its temporary > home is http://peterwawood.com/boron/simple-test.b Peter, I fixed the logic! comparison problem. I notice you are running an old version. You should use the latest code from GIT. There is no way to return an unset! value from a func!. What do you use this for? I took a quick look at your script and I see the function argument blocks are wrong. The strings and blocks are ignored but that may change in the future. The description should be a comment, not data. Type restrictions are done using datatypes following the argument name (nix the brackets). And local variables follow a bar ( | ), not /local. This is one of the few things that is actually documented! ;) http://urlan.sourceforge.net/boron/doc/UserManual.html#func -Karl |
From: Peter W A W. <pet...@gm...> - 2010-09-02 05:47:10
|
I have ported my simple-test unit testing framework to boron. Its temporary home is http://peterwawood.com/boron/simple-test.b I haven't translated the documentation yet but the original documentation should be sufficient to start with. It's at http://www.rebol.org/documentation.r?script=simple-test.r Regards Peter |
From: Peter W A W. <pet...@gm...> - 2010-09-02 05:14:50
|
Is there a way to return an unset! value from a boron function? Regards Peter |
From: Peter W A W. <pet...@gm...> - 2010-09-02 05:02:46
|
On the surface this would appear to be a bug: Boron 0.1.6 (Jul 8 2010) )> equal? true true == false )> equal? false false == false )> ne? true true == true )> ne? false false == true )> a: true == true )> b: true == true )> equal? not a not b == false )> equal? a b == false Perhaps I'm missing something? Peter |
From: Karl R. <kro...@sa...> - 2009-12-23 22:39:56
|
After a shakedown of replacing Thune in a few projects it is time for the first formal code release. Download links are on the official Boron homepage at: http://urlan.sourceforge.net/boron/ |