urdl-users — General discussion of Urdl C++ Library

[Urdl-users] Link urdl

[ludovic w. <lud...@ho...>]

Hello,

I would like to use Urdl for my application.
I download and build Urdl with openssl and gcc5.3
But, when I link urdl into ide, the app crash.
I try to launch the app .exe and it’s say the urdl’s dll is missing. (and openssl’s DLL too)
I would like link only static libraries (.a)
How I can do this ?
Thanks for help 😊

Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour Windows 10

[Urdl-users] Howto get url of redirected page?

[petke h. <pe...@ho...>]

Hi. 
First off let me say I like the library, as the interface is much nicer than cURL. I wish it was included in boost (is there a reason its not?).
There is one thing that I need to do that it seems I cant; I do a open on an url and get redirected to another url. I need to find out the url I got redirected too. Is there a way I can do this? I think its a 302 redirection.
Thanks, Petke 		 	   		  

Re: [Urdl-users] urdl roadmap

[Christopher K. <ch...@ko...>]

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:43 +0200, "Jose" <jm...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I am posting some questions so that I/others can understand what are
> your plans for urdl.
> 
> Will you encourage any contributions beyond testing and bug
> reporting/fixing ? (I do think contributions will be scarce because
> the perceived quality of the code is very high already)

Yes. I was kind of hoping to go with an adopt-a-feature approach in the
long run.

> When do you plan to release 0.2 ?

I'd estimate in a month or two, time permitting.

> What about connection pooling support and cookie support ? I believe
> these are the top feature requests. HTTP authentication is not as
> widely used and I don't think is a "must have" feature.

I'd say connection pooling will come first. Initially cookie support
will be just allowing users to get or set the HTTP headers.

> I think more info about your plans will help others consider using the
> library. E.g. Do you plan to eventually submit it to boost ?

Perhaps, but haven't decided for sure yet. I think it is good to allow
it to mature as an independent project. It helps to have real users
before submitting something for review.

> I also hope you consider getting one of the C++ book publishers to
> evaluate having a C++ book that covers boost::asio and maybe urdl. My
> opinion is that demand is already higher that for some books in the AW
> c++ series.

Yes, I would like to write a book. One reason I started Urdl was to get
more experience on using Asio to develop client-side abstractions, so
that I can advise others. Finding time is the issue, as always :)

Cheers,
Chris

[Urdl-users] urdl roadmap

[Jose <jm...@gm...>]

Hi Chris,

I am posting some questions so that I/others can understand what are
your plans for urdl.

Will you encourage any contributions beyond testing and bug
reporting/fixing ? (I do think contributions will be scarce because
the perceived quality of the code is very high already)

When do you plan to release 0.2 ?

What about connection pooling support and cookie support ? I believe
these are the top feature requests. HTTP authentication is not as
widely used and I don't think is a "must have" feature.

I think more info about your plans will help others consider using the
library. E.g. Do you plan to eventually submit it to boost ?

I also hope you consider getting one of the C++ book publishers to
evaluate having a C++ book that covers boost::asio and maybe urdl. My
opinion is that demand is already higher that for some books in the AW
c++ series.

regards
jose