A native wince build is planned for version 2.91. But it would be nice if someone familiar with wince could advice how we should implement console support and/or interprocess communication for the GUI.
L
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
The runtime decompressor stub generator part of UPX got completely rewritten. So there is a chance that something breaks which worked before. Ie, any testing is good testing :-)
L
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
i tested a lot of small tools, everything went fine.
also, i compressed the whole nero burning rom 6.6 folder, and it is running fine.
i used lzma for all files, usually it compresses a lot faster (also tighter) on my old machine. i have no idea about decompression speed though.
winupack compreses little bit better on small files, but it's not a big deal.
on bigger files, most modern packers are close, nspack, pecompact, upack etc. not very surprising i suppose.
all in all, i'm very happy but i feel sorry i didn't find any bugs yet.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi All!
Please test the new beta version for possible regressions. You should specify the "--lzma" command line option to try out the new compression method.
Thanks,Laszlo
Is there a Windows Mobile (CE) version available for this beta?
BTW the link to the previous CE version in the thread below is broken again.
Michael
A native wince build is planned for version 2.91. But it would be nice if someone familiar with wince could advice how we should implement console support and/or interprocess communication for the GUI.
L
great news! thnx for the work.
is there anything special we should test?
The runtime decompressor stub generator part of UPX got completely rewritten. So there is a chance that something breaks which worked before. Ie, any testing is good testing :-)
L
I'm testing it with my Firefox builds since 10th Oct.
http://pryan.org/mozilla/firefox/roytam1/
i tested a lot of small tools, everything went fine.
also, i compressed the whole nero burning rom 6.6 folder, and it is running fine.
i used lzma for all files, usually it compresses a lot faster (also tighter) on my old machine. i have no idea about decompression speed though.
winupack compreses little bit better on small files, but it's not a big deal.
on bigger files, most modern packers are close, nspack, pecompact, upack etc. not very surprising i suppose.
all in all, i'm very happy but i feel sorry i didn't find any bugs yet.
Seems to work well, but doing upx --brute --lzma is sometimes worse than just doing upx --brute. What's the problem?