unixtree-users Mailing List for UnixTree, XTree-alike filemanager
Brought to you by:
arkanda
Menu
▾
▴
unixtree-users — Discussion, feature requests, bug reports etc. for the UnixTree filemanager
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <mi...@gm...> - 2016-01-26 17:01:12
|
הי, הוספתי אותך עכשיו לשותפים שלי באפליקציית הטרמפים ביפמי. יש שם כבר מלא נהגים וטרמפיסטים וממש קל למצוא טרמפים. האפליקציה תעזור לשנינו לחסוך כסף! אפשר להוריד את האפליקציה פה: www.beepmeapp.com <https://www.beepmeapp.com?_rsrc=mail&_rsub=behalf-he-version-8&_ract=accept-invite&_revt=invite user mail clicked&_uisrc=join route wizard> יאללה נתראה בטרמפ :) ביי |
|
From: Melvin L H. <meh...@gm...> - 2013-10-18 19:37:44
|
Hi Guys and Gals, I am 77 and not very sharp with linux but I would like very much to install unixtree into mint 15 mate can someone help me with that? Thanks a bunch Mel |
|
From: R H. <ehe...@ya...> - 2013-06-26 20:22:08
|
Hello! http://www.webworldnetworks.com/vdh/aag.html |
|
From: R H. <ehe...@ya...> - 2008-06-07 16:01:05
|
I have a Asus EEE Pc and would like to install uxixtree. I do not have a clue how to install unix software or if it will load on a EEE PC.
Thank you
R Head
|
|
From: baitelli <bai...@ce...> - 2007-11-22 12:26:33
|
Hi
I need help!
# xt
Ksh: xt: Operation not permitted
The above message was what I got after :
# mkdir -p xt
# cd xt
# uncompress xt-x86-openbsd.tar.Z
# tar xvf xt-x86-openbsd.tar
# PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/xt export PATH
# MANPATH=/usr/local/xt/man:$MANPATH
Then I tried:
# cd ..
# rm -r xt
# pwd
/usr/local
# gunzip xt-source-3.0.2.tar.gz
# tar xvf gunzip xt-source-3.0.2.tar
# cd xt-3.0.2
# vi bldinfo
[ "$BUILDER_NAM" = "" ] && BUILDER_NAM = "Roberto Baitelli" .
[ "$BUILDER_EMA" = "" ] && BUILDER_EMA" = bai...@ce..." .
# . ./build -d openbsd
Ksh: ./build[573]: [: : unexpected operator/operand
*** Build env : "openbsd" at "/usr/local/xt-3.0.2"
*** Build opts: "-d openbsd" saved in "build.opt"
*** Build make: non-GNU
*** Build mode: debug
*** Build src : Roberto Baitelli (bai...@ce...)
*** Build info: "UnixTree" version "3.0.2" build "1028"
# make
.
../lib/libres-english.a(resfile.o)(.rodata+0x50): undefined reference to
'res_pgmi_tbl'
Collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/local/xt-3.0.2/product (line 80 of makefile).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/local/xt-3.0.2/product (line 265 of makefile).
#
I am using OpenBSD 4.0.
I installed ytree and it works fine.
But it has some limitations and this is the reason why I am trying UnixTree.
Thanks
Baitelli,r.
_________________________________________________________________
AVISO
Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente a(s) pessoa(s) indicada(s)
como destinatário(s), podendo conter informações confidenciais,
protegidas por lei.
A transmissão incorreta da mensagem não acarreta a perda de sua
confidencialidade.
Caso esta mensagem tenha sido recebida por engano, solicitamos que
seja devolvida ao remetente e apagada imediatamente de seu sistema. É
vedado a qualquer pessoa que não seja destinatário, usar, revelar,
distribuir ou copiar ainda que parcialmente esta mensagem.
_________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER
This message is destined exclusively to the intended receiver. It may
contain confidential or legally protected information.
The incorrect transmission of this message does not mean loss of its
confidentiality.
If this message is received by mistake, please send it back to the
sender and delete it from your system immediately. It is forbidden to
any person who is not the intended receiver to use, reveal,
distribute, or copy any part of this message.
_________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Frank B. <fra...@co...> - 2007-07-26 21:20:31
|
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:58:04 -0000, John Emmas <jo...@ti...> wrote: > Hi Frank - I have to admit that I don't have any of those apps - and > maybe > I should because I've been hugely disappointed with the ones I seem to > be lumbered with. For example, I'm just looking for a reliable way to > find > files on a Linux system. "whereis" isn't reliable. Nor is "find". > Lots of > people recommended Kerry Beagle search - but it only allows you to search > within your home folder!!! You can't seem to tell it to start a search > from, say /usr. You can index other folders - but it still initiates > every > search from your home folder and there doesn't seem to be a way to > change that. If I have to do global stuff, I usually log in as root. Or I, if I'm going to be doing from a terminal (command) window, I type "su" (for super user), enter the root password when prompted, and then have root authority for whatever commands I might enter. My main complaint about "whereis" is that it often returns more information than you need. I'm looking for an application, for example, and it returns the location of the app, the libraries, and all kinds of other stuff. [RAMBLING MODE ON] Konqueror is part of The K Desktop Environment. http://www.kde.org. I started using Open Office back when I was still using Windows. It's a full featured office suite based on Sun's Star Office 6 which comes in Windows, Linux, Unis, Solaris (no, I don't know what Solaris is, other than that it's an OS) and many other flavors.. Pan is a newsreader--I'm a newsgroup kind of guy. K3B is a DVD and CD burner. Opera is in my opinion without question the best web browser out there: Small, fast, and versatile. It doubles as a mail program and as a good newsreader for text newsgroups (but not for binary newsgroups). I started using the Windows version seven or eight years ago. Of course, I love messing with the insides of computers. I hadn't had my first computer for three weeks (A Radio Shack 386) before I was editing config.sys and autoexec.bat. You can learn a little about my progress from linux newbie to linux intermediate by going to my blog (see siggy) and entering "adventures in linux" in the search window about halfway down the sidebar. Not that my progress would be of any interest to you, but I've got lots of links in those posts to sites that helped me learn. [RAMBLING MODE OFF] -- Blogging from Pine View Farm--http://www.pineviewfarm.net/weblog Updates daily. Worthwhile updates occasionally. Slackware (http://www.slackware.com), XFCE (http://www.xfce.org), and Opera (http://www.opera.com): the ultimate internet experience. |
|
From: Sergiy Y. <ev...@na...> - 2007-07-26 20:01:44
|
John Emmas wrote:
> Thanks Sergiy - it did indeed find the two files when I used that
> syntax...!
>
> It's such a shame that typing "find -help" produces such a confusing Help
> page. I'm a programmer and even I found it difficult to understand. A
> typical user would be very daunted by the Help information but your
> examples were really useful.
>
> Incidentally, I know what grep is - but what is xargs?
xargs parses input stream (stdin) and generates command line arguments for the
command provided as parameter of xargs. By default it passes several arguments
at once (i.e. grep is invoked for several files, rather than separately for each
file), but this behavior can be changed using -l option. For example find ... |
xargs -l1 grep ... will invoke grep for each file. Other options allow more
complex substitution of parameters, use other delimiter for parsing and so forth.
If to be more close to topic: unfortunately UnixTree does not work for me. It
unpredictably starts consuming 100% CPU and just hangs :( And after ZTreeBold
(OS/2 version of ZTreeWin) is lacks a lot of functionality. Perhaps it worth
throw it out and write new one from scratch, probably using some other tools
than plain C...
Regards,
Sergiy.
*---------------------------------------------
ES@Home http://es.os2.ru/
|
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-07-26 19:38:29
|
> > find ~ -name .jackdrc > Thanks Sergiy - it did indeed find the two files when I used that syntax...! It's such a shame that typing "find -help" produces such a confusing Help page. I'm a programmer and even I found it difficult to understand. A typical user would be very daunted by the Help information but your examples were really useful. Incidentally, I know what grep is - but what is xargs? John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergiy Yevtushenko" <ev...@na...> To: <uni...@li...>; "John Emmas" <jo...@ti...> Sent: 26 July 2007 16:51 Subject: Re: [Unixtree-users] 3 Questions (again) > John Emmas wrote: >> Thanks Segiy, >> >> Yesterday I was just trying to find the location of a file called >> ".jackdrc" >> (note that it starts with a dot). I tried:- >> >> whereis .jackdrc >> >> and also:- >> >> find .jackdrc >> >> but neither of them found the file (actually there were 2 copies of it as >> I discovered later). >> >> Simple things like this just never seem to work for me. Was I doing >> something obviously wrong? > > First parameter of find is name of directory to start from. And if you > need to > find file with exact name, use -name <pattern> parameter instead. For > example: > > find ~ -name .jackdrc > > This command should find all .jackdrc files in your home directory. > > If pattern contains wildcards (in fact, there recognized patterns a bit > more > complex), then just put it in double quotes: > > find ~ -name "*.[cChH]" > > Command show above will find all files with extensions .c .C .h .H in home > directory and subdirectories. > > Regards, > Sergiy. > *--------------------------------------------- > ES@Home http://es.os2.ru/ |
|
From: Sergiy Y. <ev...@na...> - 2007-07-26 16:52:14
|
John Emmas wrote:
> Thanks Segiy,
>
> Yesterday I was just trying to find the location of a file called ".jackdrc"
> (note that it starts with a dot). I tried:-
>
> whereis .jackdrc
>
> and also:-
>
> find .jackdrc
>
> but neither of them found the file (actually there were 2 copies of it as
> I discovered later).
>
> Simple things like this just never seem to work for me. Was I doing
> something obviously wrong?
First parameter of find is name of directory to start from. And if you need to
find file with exact name, use -name <pattern> parameter instead. For example:
find ~ -name .jackdrc
This command should find all .jackdrc files in your home directory.
If pattern contains wildcards (in fact, there recognized patterns a bit more
complex), then just put it in double quotes:
find ~ -name "*.[cChH]"
Command show above will find all files with extensions .c .C .h .H in home
directory and subdirectories.
Regards,
Sergiy.
*---------------------------------------------
ES@Home http://es.os2.ru/
|
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-07-26 16:40:59
|
Thanks Segiy, Yesterday I was just trying to find the location of a file called ".jackdrc" (note that it starts with a dot). I tried:- whereis .jackdrc and also:- find .jackdrc but neither of them found the file (actually there were 2 copies of it as I discovered later). Simple things like this just never seem to work for me. Was I doing something obviously wrong? Thanks, John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergiy Yevtushenko" <ev...@na...> To: <uni...@li...>; "John Emmas" <jo...@ti...> Sent: 26 July 2007 14:11 Subject: Re: [Unixtree-users] 3 Questions (again) > John Emmas wrote: > >> Hi Frank - I have to admit that I don't have any of those apps - and >> maybe >> I should because I've been hugely disappointed with the ones I seem to >> be lumbered with. For example, I'm just looking for a reliable way to >> find >> files on a Linux system. "whereis" isn't reliable. Nor is "find". > > I've found that find, xargs and grep are as useful as ZTreeBold search. > For example: > > find / -type f | xargs grep "text to find" > > or > > find ~/Projects -name "*.java" | xargs grep -i "case insensitive text to > find" > > and so forth. It requires some typing, but it definitely faster, than > switching > between linux and windows <g>. > > One convenient capability of approach shown above. Command: > > find / -type f | xargs grep -l "text to find" > > produces list of matching files which then can be used for further > processing, > for example, passed to zip or used for other search: > > find / -type f | xargs grep -l "text to find" | zip matching_files -@ > > find / -type f | xargs grep -l "text to find" | xargs grep "other text" > > Hope all these will be helpful. > > Regards, > Sergiy. > *--------------------------------------------- > ES@Home http://es.os2.ru/ |
|
From: Sergiy Y. <ev...@na...> - 2007-07-26 14:11:52
|
John Emmas wrote:
> Hi Frank - I have to admit that I don't have any of those apps - and maybe
> I should because I've been hugely disappointed with the ones I seem to
> be lumbered with. For example, I'm just looking for a reliable way to find
> files on a Linux system. "whereis" isn't reliable. Nor is "find".
I've found that find, xargs and grep are as useful as ZTreeBold search. For example:
find / -type f | xargs grep "text to find"
or
find ~/Projects -name "*.java" | xargs grep -i "case insensitive text to find"
and so forth. It requires some typing, but it definitely faster, than switching
between linux and windows <g>.
One convenient capability of approach shown above. Command:
find / -type f | xargs grep -l "text to find"
produces list of matching files which then can be used for further processing,
for example, passed to zip or used for other search:
find / -type f | xargs grep -l "text to find" | zip matching_files -@
find / -type f | xargs grep -l "text to find" | xargs grep "other text"
Hope all these will be helpful.
Regards,
Sergiy.
*---------------------------------------------
ES@Home http://es.os2.ru/
|
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-07-26 13:57:58
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Bell" <fra...@co...> Sent: 26 July 2007 07:35 > > Well, the applications I use regularly work just fine for me. I spend > most of my time with Opera, Open Office, Pan, K3B, Xine, and XMMS. > Hi Frank - I have to admit that I don't have any of those apps - and maybe I should because I've been hugely disappointed with the ones I seem to be lumbered with. For example, I'm just looking for a reliable way to find files on a Linux system. "whereis" isn't reliable. Nor is "find". Lots of people recommended Kerry Beagle search - but it only allows you to search within your home folder!!! You can't seem to tell it to start a search from, say /usr. You can index other folders - but it still initiates every search from your home folder and there doesn't seem to be a way to change that. I installed UnixTree in the hope that I'd finally have a good search tool - but UnixTree is useless because I have to log every folder, one-by-one!! Under Windows I use a neat little utility called 'ext2fs' which allows me to mount Linux partitions as if they were standard Windows volumes. By doing that, I can launch ZTreeWin on them and find things that way. But I can't find anything even approaching that kind of power under Linux.... :-( John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Bell" <fra...@co...> To: <uni...@li...> Sent: 26 July 2007 07:35 Subject: Re: [Unixtree-users] 3 Questions (again) > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:03:39 -0000, John Emmas <jo...@ti...> > wrote: > >> My first encounter with Linux was about 7-8 years ago >> with a then very flaky Suse. I abandoned Linux for a while and came >> back to it again maybe 6 months ago, hoping that things might have >> improved. And to be fair to Linux, as an OS, it seems to have improved >> immeasurably - but I can't say the same about its applications. > > Well, the applications I use regularly work just fine for me. I spend > most of my time with Opera, Open Office, Pan, K3B, Xine, and XMMS. > > I first got into using Linux when an acquaintance told me how he was > self-hosting a Wordpress blog (I think he was using Fedora at the time; > he's since switched to Ubuntu) out of his basement. I thought to myself, > "That sounds like fun!" And it is. > > I ended up choosing Slackware and haven't looked back. Slack is never > cutting edge--Pat Volkerding doesn't add anything to it until he is sure > it works--and it's rock solid. > > I remember one time I went to reboot the webserver and it popped up a > message like, "this computer hasn't been rebooted in 145 days; I'm going > to do a disk check now." > > I do have one Windows computer left, primarily for my son to play some of > his games. It's useful for some proprietary Windows stuff (the way > M$ keeps messing with the *.wmv codec, for example, and the website > developers who think IE Is the Only Browser in the World), and the work > computer is Windows, but it belongs to the boss and, well, he's the boss > and almost the customers all use M$. I find Konqueror as a file manager > to be far more flexible and versatile than Windows Explorer. > > I'm very happy to have left the world of Windows behind. > > Nice chatting with you. > > > -- > Blogging from Pine View Farm--http://www.pineviewfarm.net/weblog > Updates daily. Worthwhile updates occasionally. > > Slackware (http://www.slackware.com), XFCE (http://www.xfce.org), and > Opera (http://www.opera.com): the ultimate internet experience. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > UnixTree-users mailing list > Uni...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unixtree-users |
|
From: Frank B. <fra...@co...> - 2007-07-26 11:35:34
|
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:03:39 -0000, John Emmas <jo...@ti...> wrote: > My first encounter with Linux was about 7-8 years ago > with a then very flaky Suse. I abandoned Linux for a while and came > back to it again maybe 6 months ago, hoping that things might have > improved. And to be fair to Linux, as an OS, it seems to have improved > immeasurably - but I can't say the same about its applications. Well, the applications I use regularly work just fine for me. I spend most of my time with Opera, Open Office, Pan, K3B, Xine, and XMMS. I first got into using Linux when an acquaintance told me how he was self-hosting a Wordpress blog (I think he was using Fedora at the time; he's since switched to Ubuntu) out of his basement. I thought to myself, "That sounds like fun!" And it is. I ended up choosing Slackware and haven't looked back. Slack is never cutting edge--Pat Volkerding doesn't add anything to it until he is sure it works--and it's rock solid. I remember one time I went to reboot the webserver and it popped up a message like, "this computer hasn't been rebooted in 145 days; I'm going to do a disk check now." I do have one Windows computer left, primarily for my son to play some of his games. It's useful for some proprietary Windows stuff (the way M$ keeps messing with the *.wmv codec, for example, and the website developers who think IE Is the Only Browser in the World), and the work computer is Windows, but it belongs to the boss and, well, he's the boss and almost the customers all use M$. I find Konqueror as a file manager to be far more flexible and versatile than Windows Explorer. I'm very happy to have left the world of Windows behind. Nice chatting with you. -- Blogging from Pine View Farm--http://www.pineviewfarm.net/weblog Updates daily. Worthwhile updates occasionally. Slackware (http://www.slackware.com), XFCE (http://www.xfce.org), and Opera (http://www.opera.com): the ultimate internet experience. |
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-07-26 07:03:29
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Bell" <fra...@co...> To: <uni...@li...> Sent: 25 July 2007 18:21 > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:34:54 -0000, Miki800 <mi...@gm...> wrote: > >> the project has long been dumped away, the developers dont do upgrades >> any more sure, those are some of the simplest problems >> and if ur devoted and can get dedicated enough fix it yourself > > Well, that explains a lot. Including why this mailing list is so dormant. > Admittedly, I also hadn't realised that the project was dormant but you're right - it does explain a lot. Let's face it, all OS's (indeed, all technologies) are over-hyped - but none can be as over-hyped as open source. My first encounter with Linux was about 7-8 years ago with a then very flaky Suse. I abandoned Linux for a while and came back to it again maybe 6 months ago, hoping that things might have improved. And to be fair to Linux, as an OS, it seems to have improved immeasurably - but I can't say the same about its applications. I'm so sick of having to wrestle with half-assed software that 'kinda' works but doesn't really cut the mustard. Over & over again I see open source projects where the original developer got 80% of the project working and then seemed to lose interest in it. I understand Miki's point that the s/ware is open-source so, in theory, I can customise it - but as someone who's been programming for nearly 20 years, it's never that simple. When programmers join (or take over) an existing project, they like to be joining something that's reasonably professional to begin with. I've spent too much of my life trying to make silk purses out of sow's ears. If my experience is anything to go by, Linux software is absolutely riddled with sow's ears - and I suspect that UnixTree might be one of them.... :-( John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Bell" <fra...@co...> To: <uni...@li...> Sent: 25 July 2007 18:21 Subject: Re: [Unixtree-users] 3 Questions (again) > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:34:54 -0000, Miki800 <mi...@gm...> wrote: > >> the project has long been dumped away, the developers dont do upgrades >> any more >> sure, those are some of the simplest problems >> and if ur devoted and can get dedicated enough fix it yourself > > Well, that explains a lot. Including why this mailing list is so dormant. > > I messed around with unix tree for a while, but it didn't have the > configurability that ztree for windows > (http://www.ztree.com/html/ztreewin.htm?gclid=CNXfybfew40CFR2zgAodnETYGw) > has, so I just went back to using MC or Konqueror, depending on whether I > was at the computer or ssh'ed into it. > > > -- > Blogging from Pine View Farm--http://www.pineviewfarm.net/weblog > Updates daily. Worthwhile updates occasionally. > > Slackware (http://www.slackware.com), XFCE (http://www.xfce.org), and > Opera (http://www.opera.com): the ultimate internet experience. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > UnixTree-users mailing list > Uni...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unixtree-users |
|
From: Frank B. <fra...@co...> - 2007-07-25 22:21:11
|
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:34:54 -0000, Miki800 <mi...@gm...> wrote: > the project has long been dumped away, the developers dont do upgrades= = > any more > sure, those are some of the simplest problems > and if ur devoted and can get dedicated enough fix it yourself Well, that explains a lot. Including why this mailing list is so dorman= t. I messed around with unix tree for a while, but it didn't have the = configurability that ztree for windows = (http://www.ztree.com/html/ztreewin.htm?gclid=3DCNXfybfew40CFR2zgAodnETY= Gw) = has, so I just went back to using MC or Konqueror, depending on whether = I = was at the computer or ssh'ed into it. -- = Blogging from Pine View Farm--http://www.pineviewfarm.net/weblog Updates daily. Worthwhile updates occasionally. Slackware (http://www.slackware.com), XFCE (http://www.xfce.org), and = Opera (http://www.opera.com): the ultimate internet experience. |
|
From: Miki800 <mi...@gm...> - 2007-07-25 21:34:58
|
the project has long been dumped away, the developers dont do upgrades any more sure, those are some of the simplest problems and if ur devoted and can get dedicated enough fix it yourself after all, it is open source, right? besides there isnt anymore such powerful tools like Z-TreeGold nowadays... its so absurd that linux actually works in an unefficient way so its really funny THE FUNNIEST THING IS: I can actually log my own shared hard drives using the SAMBA protocol (the one used to share folders in windows LAN networks) over linux (my pc) to a [for example] NT desktop console using ZTreeGold and see everything, and its done much faster then if I was trying to log any of my hard-drives using unix-tree or linux-tree or any other xtree-clone available out there that works on linux/unix its redicules that I can do that from another pc ON MY PC then the speed its done ON MY PC USING MY PC. thats why I give up on the xtree-clones on other platforms, you should give up as well or maybe look for some other type of xtree-clones that are using GUI but still has hotkeys XTREE style.. dunno just felt the need to type all this shit from some reason @_@ On 7/25/07, John Emmas <jo...@ti...> wrote: > > I've asked these questions before but nobody seems to have the answers:- > > 1) Is there a way for UnixTree to simply log everything under the > current folder when it starts (i.e. all the subfolders). I'm really > getting > quite tired of having to log hundreds of folders, one at a time. > > 2) Is there a way to change the displayed colours? I was told that > ALT+F10 should achieve this but it doesn't. F4+F10 allows me into the > Configuration menu but it won't let me modify anything. The current > configuration tells me that my text is yellow on a blue background, but it > isn't - it's actually a muddy red on a muddy blue which is almost > unreadable. > > 3) Finally, I've discovered that if I'm typing in some text, I can't use > the 'backspace' key to delete it. I have to move the cursor backwards > and then use the 'del' key. Is this a known restriction? > > To be frank, the combination of these problems (esp. the first two) has > turned UnixTree from being potentially a very useful product into > something > which, in practice, is utterly useless. Are these problems fixable or is > it > time to look for something else? > > Thanks, > > John > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > UnixTree-users mailing list > Uni...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unixtree-users > |
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-07-25 06:25:58
|
I've asked these questions before but nobody seems to have the answers:- 1) Is there a way for UnixTree to simply log everything under the current folder when it starts (i.e. all the subfolders). I'm really getting quite tired of having to log hundreds of folders, one at a time. 2) Is there a way to change the displayed colours? I was told that ALT+F10 should achieve this but it doesn't. F4+F10 allows me into the Configuration menu but it won't let me modify anything. The current configuration tells me that my text is yellow on a blue background, but it isn't - it's actually a muddy red on a muddy blue which is almost unreadable. 3) Finally, I've discovered that if I'm typing in some text, I can't use the 'backspace' key to delete it. I have to move the cursor backwards and then use the 'del' key. Is this a known restriction? To be frank, the combination of these problems (esp. the first two) has turned UnixTree from being potentially a very useful product into something which, in practice, is utterly useless. Are these problems fixable or is it time to look for something else? Thanks, John |
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-07-15 13:37:44
|
The 'Tips & Tricks' page ( http://www.unixtree.org/tipsntricks.htm ) on the UnixTree website recommends starting UnixTree from a console (presumably, this means from the terminal) then waiting for a few minutes to see what happens. As far as I can tell,absolutely nothing happens. What's supposed to happen?? Also - is there a way for UnixTree to simply log everything under the current folder when it starts (i.e. all the subfolders). I'm really getting quite tired of having to log all my folders, one at a time.... :-( And is there a reliable way to get into the Configuration menu? I was told that ALT+F10 should achieve this but it doesn't. F4+F10 allows me into the Configuration menu but it won't let me modify anything. According to the Help page, I should be able to modify an item by selecting it and hitting 'Enter' but both my 'Enter' keys get ignored. Finally, I've discovered that if I'm typing in some text, I can't use the 'backspace' key to delete it. I have to move the cursor backwards and then use the 'del' key. Is this a known restriction? Tnanks, John |
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-06-24 06:32:51
|
Thanks for your replies Mat. They were quite helpful. This morning, the speed problem seems to have gone. I managed to log my /usr/ folder in about 25 seconds. I have a couple of theories about what might have happened:- 1) At some stage yesterday, the 'Node Statistics' pane (which usually logs files & bytes) wasn't logging bytes any more (in fact, I think it was displaying 'Nodes' instead of 'Files' but I wouldn't swear to that). I don't know what I did to get it into that state (or back out again) but it was after it stopped logging bytes that it went slow. 2) The other possibility is that I hit some kind of upper limit. At one stage I had around 99,000 files logged (not sure how many bytes). Then I tried to log my /proc/ folder. Next time I looked, the file count had gone DOWN to about 51,000 files. It took about 6 more minutes before it reached 58,000 - after which I gave up > > SHIFT-S in this case does the thing. > Thanks - I can search my text files now!! > >>From Directory window ALT-F10, menu item 2 "Modify Screen Display" > ALT-F10 simply moves my cursor to the bottom entry in the tree. I discovered that I can press F4+F10. This brings up the Configuration menu but it won't let me modify anything. According to the Help page, I should be able to modify an item by selecting it and hitting 'Enter' but both my 'Enter' keys get ignored. Finally, I've discovered that if I'm typing in some text, I can't use the 'backspace' key to delete it. I have to move the cursor backwards and then use the 'del' key. Is this a known restriction? Thanks again, John ----- Original Message ----- From: <mat...@ar...> To: <uni...@li...> Sent: 23 June 2007 22:07 Subject: Re: [Unixtree-users] New user (disappointed) > On 23.Jun.2007, John Emmas wrote: > >> 1) It is indescribably slow compared to the others. Some of my folders > > Must be an issue with your installation/configuration. > > I use Unixtree under a current Debian etch AMD64 distribution (!), > no problems whatsoever with the xtx (32bit !!) binary. > >> 2) My display comes up with red text on a blue background which is >> almost >> unreadable. I just know there's a configuration page somewhere but I'm >> blowed if I can find it. Please help me to change the colours, >> someone.... > >>From Directory window ALT-F10, menu item 2 "Modify Screen Display" > >> 3) Surely I'm wrong about this.... but after tagging a few hundred text >> files I wanted to search them to find out which ones contained a >> particular >> text string. XTree achieved this using CTRL+S but I couldn't find >> anything >> similar under UnixTree. Please tell me there's a searching function. It > > Same command, only difference under Unixes you can't use CTRL-something, > so SHIFT-S in this case does the thing. > (Provided you use xtx, the X window binary) > >> 4) Buggy is the understatement of the year when describing UnixTree. >> I've >> been using it for around 80mins, during which time it's locked up at >> least 6 >> times. Total lock-up. No keys working. Not even the arrow keys or >> ESCAPE > > See above. > > > Regards > Mathias > > > -- > Mathias Winkler // Muenchen/Munich, Germany > mailto:mat...@ar... // Homepages: http://www.arkanda.net > http://www.XTreeFanPage.org http://www.UnixTree.org > PGP Key-ID: ED0F52BC http://www.Celibidache.de > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > UnixTree-users mailing list > Uni...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unixtree-users |
|
From: <mat...@ar...> - 2007-06-23 22:08:26
|
On 23.Jun.2007, John Emmas wrote: > 1) It is indescribably slow compared to the others. Some of my folders Must be an issue with your installation/configuration. I use Unixtree under a current Debian etch AMD64 distribution (!), no problems whatsoever with the xtx (32bit !!) binary. > 2) My display comes up with red text on a blue background which is almost > unreadable. I just know there's a configuration page somewhere but I'm > blowed if I can find it. Please help me to change the colours, someone.... >From Directory window ALT-F10, menu item 2 "Modify Screen Display" > 3) Surely I'm wrong about this.... but after tagging a few hundred text > files I wanted to search them to find out which ones contained a particular > text string. XTree achieved this using CTRL+S but I couldn't find anything > similar under UnixTree. Please tell me there's a searching function. It Same command, only difference under Unixes you can't use CTRL-something, so SHIFT-S in this case does the thing. (Provided you use xtx, the X window binary) > 4) Buggy is the understatement of the year when describing UnixTree. I've > been using it for around 80mins, during which time it's locked up at least 6 > times. Total lock-up. No keys working. Not even the arrow keys or ESCAPE See above. Regards Mathias -- Mathias Winkler // Muenchen/Munich, Germany mailto:mat...@ar... // Homepages: http://www.arkanda.net http://www.XTreeFanPage.org http://www.UnixTree.org PGP Key-ID: ED0F52BC http://www.Celibidache.de |
|
From: John E. <jo...@ti...> - 2007-06-23 18:37:28
|
My very first post and I just know I'm gonna upset a lot of fans.... I just installed UnixTree today under OpenSuse 10.2. I've been using ZtreeWin for years (under Windows) and before that, XTree and XTreeGold. A few observations about UnixTree:- 1) It is indescribably slow compared to the others. Some of my folders (e.g. /proc/) just can't be logged, no matter how long I wait. Another example (/usr/) took over 7 minutes to log 58,000 files (ZTreeWin would have taken around 6-8 seconds). 2) My display comes up with red text on a blue background which is almost unreadable. I just know there's a configuration page somewhere but I'm blowed if I can find it. Please help me to change the colours, someone.... 3) Surely I'm wrong about this.... but after tagging a few hundred text files I wanted to search them to find out which ones contained a particular text string. XTree achieved this using CTRL+S but I couldn't find anything similar under UnixTree. Please tell me there's a searching function. It was THE most impressive feature of XTree. I can't believe that it got missed out. 4) Buggy is the understatement of the year when describing UnixTree. I've been using it for around 80mins, during which time it's locked up at least 6 times. Total lock-up. No keys working. Not even the arrow keys or ESCAPE or anything. Maybe that's enough for the time being.... :-( |
|
From: Bob W. <bo...@jh...> - 2007-01-29 20:35:11
|
UnixTree Folk, I have just started with Linux Suse 10.1 Have been using DOS Xtree and Win ZTree for many years. UnixTree seems to work well except for one problem. I am trying to copy a branch from one place to another i.e. cp -r /this/dir/* /that/dir only I get an error message set root su root pw ?????????? xt # Create a node for source dir /home/bw/where_eeg # Log all files in /home/bw/where_eeg # No files logged in /srv/www/htdocs/where_eeg # Create a node for destination /srv/www/htdocs/where_eeg F4 Copy Selecet Source: /home/bw as: * Selecte Destination: /srv/www/htdocs/where_eeg Error message: SIGSEGV signal [Segmentation violation] received. Bob W. Bob Webber Ph.D. Director of Programming (EMU) Johns Hopkins Epilepsy Center Neurology Dept. Meyer 2-147 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 Office: (410)-955-7250 Fax: (410)-955-0751 E-Mail: BO...@JH... Website: http://www.neuro.jhmi.edu/profiles/Webber.html |
|
From: Mathias W. <mat...@ar...> - 2006-11-26 23:15:15
|
On 26.Nov.2006, Andrew Ward wrote: > I would like Unixtree to not display all files and directories that > begin with a dot. Is this possible? No, there's no configuration option for it (yet). Regards Mathias -- Mathias Winkler // Muenchen/Munich, Germany mailto:mat...@ar... // Homepages: http://www.arkanda.net http://www.XTreeFanPage.org http://www.UnixTree.org PGP Key-ID: ED0F52BC http://www.Celibidache.de |
|
From: Andrew W. <an...@ih...> - 2006-11-26 22:30:48
|
Hello, I would like Unixtree to not display all files and directories that begin with a dot. Is this possible? Regards, Andrew Ward. |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
