Re: [Unity-idm-discuss] Bug in Policy handling

[Sander A. <sa....@fz...>]

Good morning,

the problems we found were based on unity 3.16.1. We encountered on
Monday the situation where we changed the revision of a policy from
version 2 to version 3 (no content changes) and the user did not get
the update enquiry because they had it already at the update to version
2. We also saw that the update enquiry did not set or update the value
of the sys:policy-agreement-state attribute. And the third side effect
was that a new user account, who agreed the latest version during the
registration, got an empty enquiry (no checkbox and policy, but on
cancel and submit buttons) at the first login. Our plan was to verify
this on unity 4, before we report those issues.

Best regards,
Sander


On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, Piotr Piernik wrote:
> Dear Sander
> Generally If the policy has changed with the revision number
> increase, 
> it should appear to users automatically.
> Could you please provide more details in which scenario it won't
> work?
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards
> Piotr
> 
> W dniu 30.07.2024 o 12:36, Sander Apweiler pisze:
> > Dear Piotr,
> > nice to hear you found the reason. Can you answer my second
> > question as
> > well? We found some issues regarding policies in our 3.16.1
> > instances
> > and we are not sure if the problems based on our misconfiguration
> > or
> > unity.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Sander
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 12:20 +0200, Piotr Piernik wrote:
> > >   
> > > Dear Sander
> > >   We have problem in policy document editor - saves optional
> > > policy
> > > documents as mandatory and vice versa.
> > >   We will fix it in 4.0.1 patch.
> > >   
> > >   Best regards
> > >   Piotr
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > > W dniu 30.07.2024 o 07:13, Sander Apweiler pisze:
> > >   
> > >   
> > > >   
> > > > Good morning Krzysztof,
> > > > good morning Roman,
> > > > 
> > > > we found another bug in unity 4. We created a mandatory policy
> > > > (see
> > > > 1st
> > > > screenshot) and added it to the registration form (see 2nd
> > > > screenshot).
> > > > This policy should be mandatory but I can register without
> > > > confirmation
> > > > of the policy.
> > > > 
> > > > Another question regarding policies because I do not remember
> > > > and
> > > > the
> > > > manual is not that clear in this point. When I create a new
> > > > version
> > > > of
> > > > a policy, is the confirmation of the new version shown to all
> > > > users
> > > > or
> > > > do I need to create enquieries manually?
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Sander
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > >    
> > > >    
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Unity-idm-discuss mailing list
> > > > Uni...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unity-idm-discuss
> > > >   
> > >   

-- 
Large-Scale Data Science
Juelich Supercomputing Centre

phone: +49 2461 61 8847
fax: +49 2461 61 6656
email: sa....@fz...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
52425 Jülich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Jülich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Düren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Stefan Müller
Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Astrid Lambrecht (Vorsitzende),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. Ir. Pieter Jansens
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------