From: Krzysztof B. <kb...@un...> - 2020-08-11 18:38:10
|
Sander, W dniu 11.08.2020 o 09:39, Sander Apweiler pisze: > Dear Krzysztof, > we encountered an issue with the group administrator role. If I > remember correctly we did not cover the case where we have dedicated > managers for subgroups. At the moment the group administrator is > administrators of all subgroups and the maingroup itself. > > We have now reqeusts for the groupmanagement where multiple subgroups > are managed by dedicated people but they should not have the > administrator privileges in upper groups. > > E.g. > user1 is admin of /ABC and everything below. > user2 is admin of /ABC/DEF and everything below but not of /ABC and > /ABC/GHI > user3 is admin of /ABC/GHI and everything below but not of /ABC and > /ABC/DEF > > Is it possible to adopt the group administrator role in the way that it > is only granted downwards in the tree and not upwards? Upman was supposed to address exactly this use case. E.g. /ABC/DEF should be delegated (UpMan enabled) and user2 be project's admin. Then it will have management capabilities also in /ABC/DEF/whatever but not in say /ABC or /ABC/GHI. If you want some more "management capabilities" then extending upman is the way to proceed. Best, Krzysztof |