Re: [Unity-idm-discuss] Recommended server resources

[D B. <ba...@aw...>]

Hi!

OK, if *you* don't know the dependency then it can't be that important
for unity. ;-)

I can install with
rpm -ihv --force --nodeps unity-idm-3.2.0-1.noarch.rpm

On first startup, I get an exception in the logs:

eu.unicore.util.configuration.ConfigurationException: The value of
unityServer.core.credentials.1.credentialConfigurationFile (Credential
configuration file)= '/etc/unity-idm/samples/empty', must represent an
EXISTING and READABLE filesystem path.

Creating an empty file /etc/unity-idm/samples/empty solves the problem -
so I'm guessing the rpm is missing this file and it should be included.

I'm also getting a warning about reflective access, which I'm going to
ignore for now

WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by
org.codehaus.groovy.vmplugin.v7.Java7$1
(file:/usr/share/unity-idm/lib/groovy-2.5.6.jar) to constructor
java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup(java.lang.Class,int)
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of
org.codehaus.groovy.vmplugin.v7.Java7$1
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal
reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release

D

On 26/02/2020 15:46, Krzysztof Benedyczak wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> W dniu 26.02.2020 o 15:38, D Baum pisze:
>> Hi!
>>
>> thanks! I've now picked 4 GB RAM, 2 cores and 40 GB of disk space on a
>> CentOS 8 instance with
>> java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.5.10-2.el8_1.x86_64.
>> But installing the rpm throws an error:
>>
>> dnf install unity-idm-3.2.0-1.noarch.rpm
>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:33:00 ago on Wed 26 Feb 2020
>> 13:52:54 UTC.
>> Error:
>>   Problem: conflicting requests
>>    - nothing provides osgi(org.glassfish.hk2.hk2) needed by
>> unity-idm-3.2.0-1.noarch
>> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest'
>> to use not only best candidate packages)
>>
>> But the manual promises me that I need nothing but java11! ;-)
>>
> I'll check it (no idea what's that dependency), but anyway I'd suggest
> using tar.gz bundle. It is nicer for performing safe upgrades.
> 
> Best,
> KB
>