#1 Idea/request

open
nobody
None
5
2005-06-17
2005-06-17
Martin W
No

Hi,

I was wondering if you have considered building the dll
as a windows dll and use ctypes to create the python
binding?
Ctypes has come a long way and eliminating the need for
swig, would be a step to lesser build complexities
(IMHO anyways)

I'm developing prototype application suite and am
considering pyHook for one aspect of it, however at
some stage I may be required to build win32 application
suite, using c++ or some other "compiled" development
environment. It would be kinda cool if I could continue
to use the dll in the next stage.

Just an idea, interested to hear your comments?

Oh, and I thought I'd pass on this little tidbit - I've
had some success rebuilding the python binding with minGW.

Of cource I can build a win32 dll this way, but then I
dont currently have time to do the python binding via
with ctypes, tho If I get a chance and it works, I'll
pass on my findings.

Cheers

Martin

Discussion


Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks