Re: [UM1-coders] Ctl-S/Ctl-Q

[ReaperMan <re...@re...>]

J.P. King wrote:


>>The thing is that people have other needs (or desires), such as
>>Keith's avatar system, which would require some sort of session
>>management to remain sensible, otherwise we're going to have to
>>have a custom client, and then loose a large proportion of the
>>user base (or at least stop them from using the features).
>>
> 
> Umm, again, without having studied Keith's avatar system I am
> not sure why you would need to have a custom client interface
> thing for them.  you just do it a line at a time with prefixes
> on the lines to make it clear what is going on.  You don't want
> to make the system unusable for people who aren't using telnet,
> do you?


As Ref says, it doesn't need a special client. The session changing
will be internal to Ugly, if it is done by sessions at all. I think
Grim is just making the point that we need to include
some tf type features into Ugly. I am already implementing
one which is the @recall



Why are we having this discussion?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
       re...@re...  www.reaperman.org  +44 7976 696 407
----------------------------------------------------------------------