Re: [TwoLAME-discuss] Has anyone successfully built a shared library for OSX (Darwin)

[Nicholas J H. <nj...@ae...>]

Great, I am glad that it is working for you now.

nick.


On 25 Jul 2011, at 17:40, C Van Winkle <lis...@cv...> wrote:

> Thanks Nick,   I just noticed that there's a 0.3.13 update that came out in January.  The changes to how the inline functions are setup fixed the problem (when the buffer was initialized, the address of the buffer went to a bogus address like 0x4).   So i'm up and running now.
> 
> Also, I'm _VERY_ appreciative of the removal of the exit() calls that came in 0.3.13 as well.
> 
> Cheers.
> -Charles 
> 
> 
> On Dec 29, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
> 
>> Hi Charles,
>> 
>> I developed twolame on a Mac, but have been running it on Linux recently. I will try and have a look at this tomorrow.
>> 
>> nick.
>> 
>> 
>> On 23 Dec 2010, at 09:55, C Van Winkle wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm able to build on OSX 10.5 and 10.6 (i386 and x86_64 respectively), but when trying to call encode_buffer, it looks like one of the malloc calls is failing.
>>> 
>>> I'm simply running the standard "./configure" and "make" calls to get me going.
>>> 
>>> I've tried this with and without the osx redirection needed for malloc.h (which is in /usr/include/malloc/ on OSX).
>>> 
>>> -Charles
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
>>> to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
>>> should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
>>> without downtime or disruption
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl_______________________________________________
>>> TwoLAME-discuss mailing list
>>> Two...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/twolame-discuss
>> 
> 
>