tuxpaint-devel — General discussion list for Tux Paint developers

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Tibetan font package needed for tuxpaint: Tsampa Keyboard]

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:00:44AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> More importantly, what do I do about it?  I have asked pkg-fonts-devel
> to package this font.  Should I retract that request?  Their answer
> implies they'd be happier with a Unicode font.  Now, Debian does contain
> a package called ttf-tmuni, which contains the Tibetan Machine Uni font
> from http://www.thdl.org/.  Would this be more suitable for Tuxpaint?

It may, but I'm guessing the translation would need to be completely redone,
otherwise it will come out as ASCII gibberish. :)

See why I'm sighing? ;)

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Martin F. <mf...@gm...>]

The ghosting happens with both round and square erasers.  When I let  
go of the mouse and drag the eraser tool over the ghosted lines, or  
when I move another window over Tux Paint and move it off again, the  
ghosting disappears, so it does appear to be a refresh issue.  The  
problem does not appear in Tux Paint 0.9.15.  I'll try out the latest  
sources tonight.

Martin


On 12-Oct-06, at 1:41 AM, Bill Kendrick wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:13:02PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
>> The eraser tool leaves ghosted bounding rectangles behind as I drag
>> it across the canvas.  Is this a known bug?
>> http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~fuhrer/temp/tuxPaintEraser.jpg
>
> Oh, also, is it just the round erasers?  Or the square ones?
> (That's the big diff between 0.9.15 and 0.9.16)
>
> -bill!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,  
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your  
> job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache  
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxpaint-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc5, Config 0.0.7rc5 & Stamps 2006.10.12 sources available

[Ben A. <sy...@sa...>]

Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > How can I tell which locales I need to generate and test?  "tuxpaint
> > --lang help" shows the supported languages, but not the corresponding
> > locales.  I see we have po files for 66 languages, but there are a
> > bewildering variety of locales and encodings for some of these (e.g.
> > "ar").  I guess I can try UTF-8 any locale (e.g. ar_AE.UTF8)?
> >   
> Based on these assumptions, I am configuring my locales package to include the 
> following locales:
>
>                    12. el_GR.UTF-8  23. fr_FR.UTF-8  34. it_IT.UTF-8  45. 
> pt_BR.UTF-8  56. th_TH.UTF-8
>   2. af_ZA.UTF-8   13. en_GB.UTF-8  24. ga_IE.UTF-8  35. ja_JP.UTF-8  46. 
> pt_PT.UTF-8  57. tl_PH.UTF-8
>   3. ar_AE.UTF-8   14. en_US        25. gd_GB.UTF-8  36. ka_GE.UTF-8  47. 
> ro_RO.UTF-8  58. tr_TR.UTF-8
>   4. be_BY.UTF-8   15. en_US.UTF-8  26. gl_ES.UTF-8  37. ko_KR.UTF-8  48. 
> ru_RU.UTF-8  59. uk_UA.UTF-8
>   5. bg_BG.UTF-8   16. en_ZA.UTF-8  27. gu_IN        38. ku_TR.UTF-8  49. 
> rw_RW        60. vi_VN
>   6. br_FR.UTF-8   17. es_ES.UTF-8  28. he_IL.UTF-8  39. lt_LT.UTF-8  50. 
> sk_SK.UTF-8  61. wa_BE.UTF-8
>   7. ca_ES.UTF-8   18. es_MX.UTF-8  29. hi_IN        40. ms_MY.UTF-8  51. 
> sl_SI.UTF-8  62. xh_ZA.UTF-8
>   8. cs_CZ.UTF-8   19. et_EE.UTF-8  30. hr_HR.UTF-8  41. nb_NO.UTF-8  52. 
> sq_AL.UTF-8  63. zh_CN.UTF-8
>   9. cy_GB.UTF-8   20. eu_FR.UTF-8  31. hu_HU.UTF-8  42. nl_NL.UTF-8  53. 
> sr_CS.UTF-8  64. zh_TW.UTF-8
>   10. da_DK.UTF-8  21. fi_FI.UTF-8  32. id_ID.UTF-8  43. nn_NO.UTF-8  54. 
> sv_SE.UTF-8
>   11. de_DE.UTF-8  22. fo_FO.UTF-8  33. is_IS.UTF-8  44. pl_PL.UTF-8  55. ta_IN
>
>
> The .po files for which there do not seem to be locales in the locales package 
> on Debian are:
>
> bo.po (Tibetan)
> gos.po (Gronings)
> sw.po (Swahili)
> tlh.po (Klingon)
>   

I assume this is why, although the other locales can be tested with, e.g.

LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 tuxpaint

or

tuxpaint --locale fr_FR.UTF-8

or

tuxpaint --lang french

all of which start tuxpaint in French, none of these methods of
specifying language work for the languages without locales listed above.

Ben

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc5, Config 0.0.7rc5 & Stamps 2006.10.12 sources available

[Ben A. <sy...@sa...>]

Bill Kendrick wrote:
> Ok, yet another set of release candidates.  This time, all three packages:
>
>   Tux Paint 0.9.16rc5
>   Tux Paint Config 0.0.7rc5
>   Tux Paint Stamps 2006.10.12
>
> Ben, John, Martin and any other porters/packagers, please let me know
> if you have issues, or if you've got builds for me to post so that
> others can play with them.
>   

How can I tell which locales I need to generate and test?  "tuxpaint
--lang help" shows the supported languages, but not the corresponding
locales.  I see we have po files for 66 languages, but there are a
bewildering variety of locales and encodings for some of these (e.g.
"ar").  I guess I can try UTF-8 any locale (e.g. ar_AE.UTF8)?

Ben

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Tibetan font package needed for tuxpaint: Tsampa Keyboard]

[Ben A. <sy...@sa...>]

Bill Kendrick wrote:
> Ah, yes, this is one of those fonts where A-Z and other 'ASCII' characters
> have been mapped to another language (in this case, Tibetan).
>
> (look at the TTF in a font viewer and you'll see...  in Windows, for
> example, instead of "The quick brown fox...", I get Tibetan characters...
> presumably nonsensical gibberish.)
>   

More importantly, what do I do about it?  I have asked pkg-fonts-devel
to package this font.  Should I retract that request?  Their answer
implies they'd be happier with a Unicode font.  Now, Debian does contain
a package called ttf-tmuni, which contains the Tibetan Machine Uni font
from http://www.thdl.org/.  Would this be more suitable for Tuxpaint?

Ben

[Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc5, Config 0.0.7rc5 & Stamps 2006.10.12 sources available

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

Ok, yet another set of release candidates.  This time, all three packages:

  Tux Paint 0.9.16rc5
  Tux Paint Config 0.0.7rc5
  Tux Paint Stamps 2006.10.12

Ben, John, Martin and any other porters/packagers, please let me know
if you have issues, or if you've got builds for me to post so that
others can play with them.

It's in the usual place:

  ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/source/

Thanks & enjoy!

-- 
-bill!
bi...@ne...
http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:13:02PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
> The eraser tool leaves ghosted bounding rectangles behind as I drag  
> it across the canvas.  Is this a known bug?
> http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~fuhrer/temp/tuxPaintEraser.jpg

Oh, also, is it just the round erasers?  Or the square ones?
(That's the big diff between 0.9.15 and 0.9.16)

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:13:02PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
> The eraser tool leaves ghosted bounding rectangles behind as I drag  
> it across the canvas.  Is this a known bug?
> http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~fuhrer/temp/tuxPaintEraser.jpg

This does not seem to happen on x86 Linux or Windows.
I've expanded the screen refresh by 1px on each side, in case there's
some math difference going on when it determines how big the XOR was
that needs to be drawn.

I'm committing to CVS now.

Did this not happen on Tux Paint 0.9.15?  I don't rememebr it... :^/

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:52:13PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
> Aha, that's the problem.  I didn't compile with -DHAVE_STRCASESTR, so  
> TuxPaint's custom strcasestr() is being called.  I had to change the  
> return statement from
> 
> return (result - uphaystack + (char *) haystack);
> 
> to:
> 
> if (result != NULL)
>      return (result - uphaystack + (char *) haystack);
> else
>      return NULL;
> 
> and now everything runs fine.  I still have to clean up a couple  
> things and then I'll get a disk image posted.

I've applied this change to CVS, too.  Thanks!

Glad to hear it's working, can't wait to give it a try!

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Martin F. <mf...@gm...>]

The eraser tool leaves ghosted bounding rectangles behind as I drag  
it across the canvas.  Is this a known bug?
http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~fuhrer/temp/tuxPaintEraser.jpg

Martin

On 11-Oct-06, at 7:53 PM, Bill Kendrick wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:45:56PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
>> I had some time last night to put together a universal binary of Tux
>> Paint 0.9.16rc2.  It compiles :-) but doesn't run :-(  I'm getting
>> the following error:
> <snip>
>
> Oh, and in the meantime, try moving all of the ".dat" files out of the
> way, just to see if Tux Paint runs.  Those specific brushes will not
> look right, nor work they way they should (e.g., animated and/or  
> directional),
> but otherwise things should work.
>
> Feel free to see if all ~70 locales are rendering properly, too. ;^D
> (My wrist hurts after doing that _twice_ just now under WinXP :^( )
>
> THx!
>
> -bill!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,  
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your  
> job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache  
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxpaint-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Martin F. <mf...@gm...>]

>
> Now, why it's trying to load the .dat file as a PNG is confusing,  
> because
> it should skip it.
>
> Line 5627 of tuxpaint.c:
>
>     if (strcasestr(files[i].str, ".png"))
>
> (It's an implicit test of "!= NULL" there, btw.)
>
>
>> and I've checked that I
>> linked against SDL 1.2.11 and SDL Image 1.2.5, which I believe are
>> the latest versions.  Any ideas?
>
> See if strcasestr is working right? :)

Aha, that's the problem.  I didn't compile with -DHAVE_STRCASESTR, so  
TuxPaint's custom strcasestr() is being called.  I had to change the  
return statement from

return (result - uphaystack + (char *) haystack);

to:

if (result != NULL)
     return (result - uphaystack + (char *) haystack);
else
     return NULL;

and now everything runs fine.  I still have to clean up a couple  
things and then I'll get a disk image posted.

Martin

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Tibetan font package needed for tuxpaint: Tsampa Keyboard]

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:41:10PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Can someone give me some info?
> 

Ah, yes, this is one of those fonts where A-Z and other 'ASCII' characters
have been mapped to another language (in this case, Tibetan).

(look at the TTF in a font viewer and you'll see...  in Windows, for
example, instead of "The quick brown fox...", I get Tibetan characters...
presumably nonsensical gibberish.)

*sigh*

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:45:56PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
> I had some time last night to put together a universal binary of Tux  
> Paint 0.9.16rc2.  It compiles :-) but doesn't run :-(  I'm getting  
> the following error:
<snip>

Oh, and in the meantime, try moving all of the ".dat" files out of the
way, just to see if Tux Paint runs.  Those specific brushes will not
look right, nor work they way they should (e.g., animated and/or directional),
but otherwise things should work.

Feel free to see if all ~70 locales are rendering properly, too. ;^D
(My wrist hurts after doing that _twice_ just now under WinXP :^( )

THx!

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:45:56PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
> I had some time last night to put together a universal binary of Tux  
> Paint 0.9.16rc2.  It compiles :-) but doesn't run :-(  I'm getting  
> the following error:
> 
> Error: I couldn't load a graphics file:
> Tux Paint.app/Contents/Resources/brushes//kuroneko.dat
> The Simple DirectMedia Layer error that occurred was:
> Unsupported image format
> 
> I presume kurenko.dat is an image file,

No, it is a text file describing some details about the "kuroneko.png"
brush image.  (Most brushes do not have corresponding .dat files, but 
this one, and some others, do.)

Now, why it's trying to load the .dat file as a PNG is confusing, because
it should skip it.

Line 5627 of tuxpaint.c:

    if (strcasestr(files[i].str, ".png"))

(It's an implicit test of "!= NULL" there, btw.)


> and I've checked that I  
> linked against SDL 1.2.11 and SDL Image 1.2.5, which I believe are  
> the latest versions.  Any ideas?

See if strcasestr is working right? :)
Thx!

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16 build for Mac OS X?

[Martin F. <mf...@gm...>]

I had some time last night to put together a universal binary of Tux  
Paint 0.9.16rc2.  It compiles :-) but doesn't run :-(  I'm getting  
the following error:

Error: I couldn't load a graphics file:
Tux Paint.app/Contents/Resources/brushes//kuroneko.dat
The Simple DirectMedia Layer error that occurred was:
Unsupported image format

I presume kurenko.dat is an image file, and I've checked that I  
linked against SDL 1.2.11 and SDL Image 1.2.5, which I believe are  
the latest versions.  Any ideas?

Martin


On 18-Sep-06, at 11:16 PM, Bill Kendrick wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:59:15PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote:
>> Yes, I will look into making a Universal binary (PPC/Intel).  The SDL
>> libraries are already universal, so the frameworks just need to be
>> included in the TuxPaint application bundle.  I'll have to compile
>> libiconv, libintl, and libpng as universal libraries, and link those
>> in - provided this goes alright, we should be in business.  We have
>> to keep in mind that universal binary apps need to be compiled with
>> gcc 4, and gcc 4 compiled apps typically require Mac OS X 10.3.9 or
>> later to run (so a universal binary that also runs on 10.2.8 is most
>> likely not possible).
>
> Hrm, would it be a huge pain to produce two versions of Tux Paint,
> at least for a while?  One universal binary for 10.3.9 and above, and
> a version that's more compatible with 10.2.8...?
>
> I now realize how insanely expensive commercial operating systems  
> can be,
> and can understand parents and schools still using the older  
> platforms.
> (It still works, right!? :^) )
>
> <snip>
>> Okay, we'll see how things develop in the coming weeks...
>
> :^)
>
>
> <snip>
>> I think it's better just to stick with the disk image DMG version.
>> PKG installers are useful if the program has multiple files that need
>> to be installed in various locations on a user's drive, but because
>> Tux Paint has been bundled into a single "file" (the "Tux Paint.app"
>> bundle) that the user can drag from the disk image to any location on
>> the hard drive, a PKG installer would be redundant.
>
> Okay!  ("not broken, don't fix it"... sounds good :^) )
>
>
> <snip>
>> Sure, Matt, I'd be happy to show you through compiling the Tux Paint
>> in XCode. Perhaps we can discuss this in couple weeks, once I am able
>> to free up a bit more time.  You can also catch me on iChat
>> <mf...@ma...>
>
> I've also seen Matthew on freenode. :)
>
>
> -- 
> -bill!
> bi...@ne...
> http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to  
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn  
> cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? 
> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxpaint-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel

[Tuxpaint-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Tibetan font package needed for tuxpaint: Tsampa Keyboard]

[Ben A. <sy...@sa...>]

Can someone give me some info?

Ben

[Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc4 & Config 0.0.7rc4 source released

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:24:39AM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:31:15AM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
> > 
> > I've put together a 0.9.16rc3 of the tuxpaint source on my FTP site:
> 
> Not so fast!  I'm about to push 0.9.16rc4.

Ok, rc4 is now available, and now I've got to get back to my day job.
Have at it! :)

Changes since 0.9.16rc3:

* Making sure default UI font is used for untranslated strings.
  (Hindi font, for example, didn't seem to have roman characters.)

* Added missing langages to man page.

* Added missing languages to "--lang" options list.

* Added missing languages to --locale option listing.

* Fixed alphabetization of "--lang help" output.


And I've also updated tuxpaint-config 0.0.7 and released an rc4 tarball:

* Added numerous missing locales!


At the usual place:

  ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/source/


-- 
-bill!
bi...@ne...
http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc3 source released

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:31:15AM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
> 
> I've put together a 0.9.16rc3 of the tuxpaint source on my FTP site:

Not so fast!  I'm about to push 0.9.16rc4.

Kartik popped up in #tux4kids IRC channel and mentioned that Hindi
was rendering more accurately, so I went to test it.

Then I discovered that the Hindi font lacked the characters to display
english text -- while the button labels and the 'Tux tips' at the bottom
that I saw looked fine, things like the prompts for quitting or creating
a new image came out as mostly boxes.

There's a work-around that's used in button labels: if the string translated
(strcmp(str, gettext(str) != 0), use the locale-specific font, _otherwise_
use the default UI font.

I'll do a cursory glance at all ~70 languages Tux Paint has been
translated to, just to make sure obvious issues like this aren't happening
elsewhere.

I'm leaving it up to the translators (see my post to tuxpaint-i18n
earlier today) to make sure things actually still _say_ the right things. :)

-bill!

[Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc3 source released

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

I've put together a 0.9.16rc3 of the tuxpaint source on my FTP site:

  ftp://ftp.billsgames.com/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/source/

Changes since 0.9.16rc2:

  * Added Ndebele translation
  * Changed Vietnamese font
  * Fixed 'Colors' redraw issue after slideshow
  * Some Windows installer description (ISS) changes


-- 
-bill!
bi...@ne...
http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] I would like to provide Turkish language support to your web pages which about Tux Paint software

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:31:02AM -0700, Fatma =D6zkan wrote:
> I have gotten an account from sourceforge.net. How can l join your proj=
ect?=20
>=20

Fatma sent me a private message with his SF.net username, so I've
added it to the project and sent a detailed private email explaining how
to use a command-line CVS client. ;^)

Fatma - let's move further conversation of this over to the tuxpaint-i18n
mailing list, where it's more appropriate.  Thanks!

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] I would like to provide Turkish language support to your web pages which about Tux Paint software

[Fatma Ö. <fat...@ya...>]

I have gotten an account from sourceforge.net. How can l join your project? 

Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...> wrote:  On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 04:42:22AM -0700, Fatma Özkan wrote:
> Thus, I’m willing to translate your web site into Turkish with your permission. I would really appreciate if you could provide help and advice considering the things I should be careful of or what kind of an approach I should follow, etc. 
> 

Hi Fatma, thank you so much for your offer to help. It would be much
appreciated! :^)


> I would be grateful if you could reply as soon as possible (wheter it’s positive or negative) since I have to forward the message of approval to my lecturer before I could begin the project until 16 October. I would also need another short message at the end confirming that the project has been completed. 

Sorry for not replying to your private email regarding this sooner.


I'll assume that you know some amount of HTML coding. For the most part,
translators do not need to worry about the HTML, CSS or PHP, aside from
keeping my PHP calls where they are, and using the same (or similar) HTML
and CSS markup for formatting the text on the pages.

Almost all of the Tux Paint website is based on PHP-generated pages
(mostly to handle the sidebar navigation), and this 'source code' to the
website is stored in Tux Paint's CVS repository on SourceForge.net.

Are you familiar with SourceForge? It would help if you had your own
account, then I could provide you with write-access to the CVS repository,
so you can simply work on your translations, commit them to CVS, and then
the next time I do an 'update' (to pull the latest changes out of CVS),
the tuxpaint.org website will have your updates.

There are free clients for accessing a CVS repository for Windows, Mac and
Linux -- both command-line and graphical (GUI).


PS - You may also want to subscribe to the tuxpaint-i18n mailing list,
where we try to focus the translation- and localization-related questions.
( http://www.tuxpaint.org/mailinglists/ )


Thanks!

-- 
-bill!
bi...@ne...
http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Tuxpaint-devel mailing list
Tux...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel



Iyi Calismalar... 
Fatma OZKAN 
  Marmara Universitesi

 		
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2 & friends available

[TOYAMA Shin-i. <sh...@wm...>]

Thank you bill,

Ben,

ja.ttf in tuxpaint-0.9.16 is a simple and very small subset of 
sazanami-gothic.ttf. 

-----  From "fonts/locale/ja_docs/COPYING.txt -----------------

Sazanami-Gothic-noBitmap-noKanji.ttf (Custumized for TuxPaint)
 
This is a custumized subset of Sazanami-Gothic.ttf for TuxPaint.
Difference between original are, 

  a) Bitmap data which prevent correct rendering (due to SDL_ttf
     bug) are removed.
  b) All Kanji data not used in TuxPaint are removed.

---------------------------------------------------------------

So, I think it doesn't make too much sense to prepare separate 
font package of it.

Thank you.

Bill Kendrick wrote in <200...@so...>

>I forget (don't have CHANGES.txt in front of me), is the Japanese font
>for Tux Paint scaled down to only apply to the characters used in Tux Paint
>(like the Chinese font)?  If so, you may need to ask Shin-Ichi for a 'fixed'
>font that includes all characters... unless you were thinking of packaging
>this as a tuxpaint-specific font deb pkg...?

-- 
TOYAMA Shin-ichi mailto:sh...@wm...

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2 & friends available

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:17:35AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > jp - as Shin-Ichi said, needs to use his hacked version
> >   
> This still should go into a separate font package so that others can use
> it, and my preference would be that it goes into the existing package in
> Debian.

I forget (don't have CHANGES.txt in front of me), is the Japanese font
for Tux Paint scaled down to only apply to the characters used in Tux Paint
(like the Chinese font)?  If so, you may need to ask Shin-Ichi for a 'fixed'
font that includes all characters... unless you were thinking of packaging
this as a tuxpaint-specific font deb pkg...?

> > vi - need to find Free replacement
> >   
> If you decide on the font you've suggested, I'll see if I can find
> someone in Debian to package it.

cvs update ;)

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2 & friends available

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:17:35AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> 
> Looks promising.  Do we have someone who knows the language to verify it
> looks OK?

I did a cursory glance.  Looked fine. :)

Gotta run,

-bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2 & friends available

[Ben A. <sy...@sa...>]

Ben Armstrong wrote:
> There is a ttf-devanagari-fonts package in Debian, but there is no font
> named Raghu or Raghindi in it.  There are just these:
>   

I have emailed the maintainers (Debian-IN Team
<deb...@li...>) to ask for help packaging this.

Ben