|
From: deepak a. <dee...@gm...> - 2016-04-19 12:40:38
|
On Apr 19, 2016 4:28 PM, "Holger Levsen" <ho...@la...> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:56:52PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Holger Levsen <ho...@la...> > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:07:02PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote: > > > > After discussing with the other mentors and contributors, we have > > > decided to use Github for day to day development and alioth for release. > > > where did this discussion take place? > > Over hangout as it's the quickest. > > :-( it also is rather exclusive, mail is much more inclusive, as it > allows offline participation & is more accessible to many (think shy > people or people less fluent in spoken words in a foreign languages). > and (i'm pretty sure but surely might have missed it) you didnt once > mention on the tuxmath + tuxtype list that there is a hangout "group"(?) > for tux4kids… :/ Ya actually a lot of things are still fragmented right now. Discussion list is one of them. > > I've wondered several times where gsoc coordination for tux4kids > happened, as it evidently did, even though there werent't any traces on > the lists I read… Actually there is a Tux4Kids-mentor Google group where GSoc coordination occurs. We are using it for the past few year but we delete old threads whenever new GSoc starts. So you wont be able to read previous years thread. > Bastien: (indepent of any hangouts) I btw think that we miss one list > tux4kids-devel - we only have tux4kids-tuxtype-dev and tuxmath-devel… > > And we probably miss and up2date authoritive source which lists and > other communication media exist. > > > -- > cheers, > Holger |