From: LM <lm...@gm...> - 2016-04-11 11:36:28
|
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Bastien wrote: > I'm worried that tuxmath seems largely unmaintained right now. > Am I correct? It did seem hard to connect with anyone in charge of maintenance in order to discuss patches or enhancements. At this point I have a fork of Tuxmath. I started with whatever I could download from the alioth site and made several modifications. I also found it really hard to get the latest tarballs from the alioth archive. It wants users to sign in. Some of the files I ended up taking down one at a time while viewing them. I've tested my code on Windows and Linux and it seems to run fine on both systems. I've cleaned up some code no longer used and fixed some memory issues. I've also fixed sdl_ttf support which didn't look like it had been used or tested in a long time. Guess most users are working with cairo instead of sdl_ttf. I added the option to remove the dependency on GTK+ libraries like librsvg. I can now use nanosvg instead for basic svg support. I have t4k_common building with SDL2 (or SDL 1.2.x). I have plans to get Tuxmath building with SDL2 as well, but haven't had time to work on them lately. It would be nice to combine some of what I've done back with the original project, but wasn't able to figure out who to contact to even suggest it. Sincerely, Laura http://www.distasis.com/cpp |