From: Holger L. <ho...@la...> - 2011-12-26 12:14:59
|
Hi David, On Sonntag, 25. Dezember 2011, David Bruce wrote: > I had tried to set tags for the releases (e.g. "v2.0.3") but must have > done something wrong, as they indeed do not show up with "git tag -l". you could still checkout these commits and tag them :) > The last tuxmath source release is what's on alioth: ok > It has the gpg hashes to verify package integrity and that it was > signed by me, but that's a separate issue from the git sha to pin down > the exact commit corresponding to this release. ok, cool. > Tuxtype and t4k_common are at 1.8.1 and 0.1.1 respectively, as you wrote. ok. I noticed in issue in t4k_common: there doesnt seem to be a note about the copyright of the images (sigh, I know...), even though I assume they are copyright by you, a they are the same as in tuxmath where git blame doc/README_DATA_LICENCES tells me 7839162e doc/README_DATA_LICENSES.TXT (David Bruce <davidstuartbruce @nospam@ 2009-02-15 17:00:03 +0000 48) data/imates/status/*: 7839162e doc/README_DATA_LICENSES.TXT (David Bruce <davidstuartbruce @nospam@ 2009-02-15 17:00:03 +0000 49) right.png, right_gray.png, left.png, left_gray.png, stop.png modified from 7839162e doc/README_DATA_LICENSES.TXT (David Bruce <davidstuartbruce @nospam@ 2009-02-15 17:00:03 +0000 50) GPL-licensed KDE icons by David Bruce using the GIMP. All other images created 7839162e doc/README_DATA_LICENSES.TXT (David Bruce <davidstuartbruce @nospam@ 2009-02-15 17:00:03 +0000 51) by Sam Hart or Bill Kendrick. So I probably only need to write this up nicely for debian/copyright and I can upload. Am I right about the images in t4k_common? > There have been enough enhancements from google code-in to make it > worthwhile for me to put out another release of tuxmath when the > program wraps up in a couple of weeks. great! cheers, Holger |