From: Tasos L. <tla...@gm...> - 2011-02-10 14:06:16
|
On 02/10/2011 03:22 PM, Volker Grabsch wrote: > Tasos Latsas schrieb: >> I will also look into it, see how I can help, but I don't promise as >> pkg-config/Autoconf stuff are new to me.. > > Feel free to ask if you run into any problems. I'd be happy to have > a look at your *.ac / *.in files. > >>> However, some distributions like Debian don't install those, maybe >>> because their build scripts were written in a time where those libraries >>> didn't provide a *.pc file. I think it would be a good idea to provide >>> bug reports for those distributions, but I didn't yet find the time >>> to do that. Any volunteers? >> >> From a quick look here [1] only Archlinux and Fedora from the major >> distributions ship SDL_ttf.pc (i dont know if this list is up-to-date >> though). I could file those bug reports if the Autoconf solution doesn't >> work. > > The distro bugreports are not about how to make things _work_; they > are about how to make things _easier_. So I recommend to file those > bugreports in any case, if you find some time for that. The bugreports > are not to solve things _now_, but to make things better in the future. > > Currently, lots of projects are facing the same issues and the same > ugly workaround as you do - not because the library authors don't > provide *.pc file, but because the distributions don't install those. > That's what's making all your life unnecessarily hard. As soon as > all major distros fix those issues, many projects will be able to > throw out lots of workarounds from their configure.ac files. :-) > > Yes I understand that, I'll try to file some this weekend and post back. Maybe a feature request instead of a bugreport would be more appropriate? One last thing, under which packages should I file them? sdl_ttf and sdl_mixer, or sdl_ttf only? Thanks -- Tasos Latsas GPG : 0x219810C9 / B487 351A 6EEC B7C3 E78E F4D9 7217 5B4B 2198 10C9 Jabber: tl...@ja... www : http://ttys.homelinux.net |