Re: [Tuxmath-devel] TuxMath 1.9.0 released

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

Hi David,

On Montag, 22. November 2010, David Bruce wrote:
> > Is t4k_common included in the tuxmath 1.9.0 tarball? For how long do you
> > think this will be the case?
> No, they are two separate tarballs (at least that's how I posted them
> today).  I'm very open to any suggestions about how best to bundle
> them together to make them as foolproof as possible for people to
> install.  Not wanting to reinvent the wheel, I asked on the Autoconf
> list if there is a standard or recommended way to do this.  The
> suggestion I got was just to stick the two tarballs into a
> super-package and provide a brief script to unpack and install them.

Considering that this is just temporary anyway (because in future releases of 
t4k_common will probably be published "independently" of tuxmath and tuxtype, 
right?) I think what you did is sensible for the time being.

I wonder if I should start with a t4k-common source package now, or include it 
in tuxmath... thoughts?


cheers,
	Holger