From: <vic...@gm...> - 2010-09-27 00:32:27
|
Hi guys, On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Brendan Luchen <bm...@ri...> wrote: > Victor, > > Also make sure you're in the right branch, commonification AKA master, and > not in old_master. TuxType may have issues when trying to use t4k_common, > even if everything goes right. If you have some time to help out, that might > be a good place to start--let me know. > I'm in the right branch, the current master (commonification). I've waited the merge to start looking into the code again. > As for the ldconfig step, maybe we could just tack on a "It's now > recommended to run `ldconfig /path/to/lib` to ensure the library is found" > message when installed from source. > True. To run Tuxtype 'sudo ldconfig /usr/local/lib' works fine but the problem to compile tuxmath persists. This is something different from the PATH environmental variable that > is used to find binaries. > > Let me know if "sudo ldconfig" doesn't fix it. As t4kcommon becomes > part of our standard setup, we need to come up with a foolproof way to > avoid problems like this. > I'm still having trouble with tuxmath compilation. I didn't look at the code yet to see why T4K_LoadScaledImag is an undefined reference because I think it is some config problem as it was with tuxtype. I'm using arch linux 64bits by the way. I also have osx Leopard installed.. -- ------------------------------------- Victor Tozo de Carvalho |