From: David B. <dav...@gm...> - 2010-07-05 19:12:10
|
Hi, > Hmm, an interesting question. I think if we want to have the logo display for > 2s, then I agree there is little point in further optimization, since you've > gotten the loading time down below that. I guess the key question is whether > we want to have the logo there for 2s. > > For a developer who might be testing tuxmath many times a day, a 2s delay > could become annoying. But I bet for a kid who might just launch it once per > day, that's probably a reasonable amount of time to devote to "branding." So > overall I would vote that additional optimization is not necessary. Anybody > feel differently? Maybe we should try to test this on an old, low-powered machine to see if it takes longer than 2s on such hardware. If so, it would be worthwhile to try to further optimize it. As for shortening the "splash" time to less than 2s, it might be nice to get it down to 1s or so, but I would consider it to be a low priority. David |