Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Similarity in code of Tuxmath/Tuxtype

[Vikas S. <vik...@gm...>]

Hello

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Brendan Luchen <bm...@ri...> wrote:
>
>
> By conflicts, do you mean name clashes, or duplication, or something
> else? I'm thinking of adding a prefix to all routines, e.g.
> T4K_CheckFile() to avoid naming conflicts until later in the summer,
> when it's time to permanently switch over TuxMath and TuxType to use
> the library instead of internal implementations. Then, it will be a
> choice between adding the T4K_ prefix to all function calls (ouch) or
> using macros to patch things up. But that's mostly my problem.
>
> My problem was to consider libt4k-common for my code or not.
So , as David pointed out that it would be better to go without considering
libt4k-admin
I also decide to go with that.


> >If I Recall Correctly, Vikas, you're working on the admin tool?


My work will aslo involves changes in Tuxmath and Tuxtype.


> If so then I expect there will not be *too much* overlap between what
> you're
> writing and what is already in libt4kcommon. I will try to keep an eye
> on your stuff, and when it is almost complete, I think we should then
> move it into the library.


Yes, that will be fine.



-- 
Regards ,
Vikas Singh