From: David B. <db...@ta...> - 2006-06-17 16:36:01
|
Hi Holger, On Tuesday 13 June 2006 06:42, Holger Levsen wrote: > I saw the README was last updated in may, is that new option reflected > there? (BTW, you might also want to take a look at the TODO file.) > > 2. Support for questions in the forms num1 + ? = num3 and ? + num2 = > > num3. These are off by default but can be selected with the command line > > arguments "--answersfirst" and "--answersmiddle", respectively. These were in there but I forgot to change the date. I have just commited svn revision 10 which includes this minor update. > > p.s. Holger, is there anything else I need to do to "release" any of > > these revisions to the public? > > No strictly a need, but a very nice to have: give tuxmath a version number! > :) So far, it has only been released with a date-revision like "2001.09.07" > or "0.0.20050316". I'm not sure if "1.0" is yet appropriate (but you > decide), but something like "1.0" or "0.9" or $whatever would surely be > very nice. > > Having the version number somewhere in the source (setup.h?) is sufficient, > having the svn version in the README is fine, though having it there as > well is also nice. Your choice. I have made the executive decision that we are at version 0.8, and mentioned it in README.txt, tuxmath.h, and CHANGES.txt. I figure we can work on it some more so that version 1.0 may coincide with Etch. > > Also, you could have a look at http://tuxmath.sourceforge.net/ and try to > change that or point to a better page. Yes, that ought to be updated. > > regards & kudos & thanks for your work, > Holger Thanks -- David Bruce |