Re: [TuxKart-devel] A small tought about diferences in tuxkart and supertuxkart

[Coz - <cos...@ho...>]

>From: Ricardo Cruz <ri...@ae...>
>To: tux...@li...
>CC: "Coz -" <cos...@ho...>
>Subject: Re: [TuxKart-devel] A small tought about diferences in tuxkart and 
>supertuxkart design..
>Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:01:46 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mailrly03.isp.novis.pt ([195.23.133.213]) by 
>mc2-f24.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 11 Apr 2005 
>06:52:10 -0700
>Received: (qmail 7803 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2005 13:52:12 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO mailfrt12.isp.novis.pt) ([195.23.133.228])     
>      (envelope-sender <ri...@ae...>)          by mailrly03.isp.novis.pt 
>with compressed SMTP; 11 Apr 2005 13:52:12 -0000
>Received: (qmail 3831 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2005 13:52:11 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO docelar.lan) 
>(Sent_by_authenticated_user_x2476431@[195.23.152.238])          
>(envelope-sender <ri...@ae...>)          by mailfrt12.isp.novis.pt with 
>SMTP; 11 Apr 2005 13:52:11 -0000
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Z3TmmkSEdPtfpLB7P/ybN8=
>User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
>References: <BAY...@ph...>
>Return-Path: ri...@ae...
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Apr 2005 13:52:10.0947 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[A89B6130:01C53E9D]
>
>
>Hi Coz,
>
>  I'd be already happy if *one* person would work in *one* of the projects! 
>:D
>
>  Really, in my modest opinion, that idea of yours is imbecil. Because it 
>would
>be waste of efforts and, in the end, we would end up with two unfinished
>games. Besides, there aren't that many differences between computer kart
>games. Or do you have any to suggest?
>
>  Anyway, in the far future, when TuxKart is mature enough, it might be a 
>good
>idea to create some mods. But a better approach might be to throw lots of
>functionality that could be enabled by track designers.
>
>Cheers,
>  Ricardo
>
>Em Domingo, 10 de Abril de 2005 18:46, o Coz - escreveu:
> > I was just thinking that tuxkart and supertuxkart, since they are 
>different
> > proyects now should have slightly different aims. Besides all the
> > supertuxkart is more desorganized than tuxkart but supertuxkart has more
> > features thingie, I mean like, design aims.
> >
> > I remember once that steve barker sayd that in tuxkart people should 
>spend
> > almost all the time driving. Maybe we could turn that into a gameplay
> > difference, where supertuxkart would focus more on fighting than driving
> > and the opposite would be for tuxkart?
> >
> > If anybody is listening, specially steve barker since tuxkart is his
> > project, I pretty much would just want to know that if someone works in
> > tuxkart and someone else works in supertuxkart in the end they will be
> > pretty much be the same thing just with minimal differences that nobody
> > cares and when someone asks which one is better instead of saying   "if 
>you
> > like <insert type of game> more you should choose tuxkart but if you 
>like
> > <insert type of game here> more you should choose supertuxkart", they 
>say
> > "well.. emm.. I dunno they are almost the same it's just matter of
> > preference...".
> >
>--
><cesarb> Damn, every time I spawn, qf-client-x11 locks hard
><Zoid> Don't die?
><Knghtbrd> good incentive.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Amor: busca tu ½ naranja http://latam.msn.com/amor/