Dmitry prefer a fork of TurckMMCache rather than give an Admin access.
Let's go fork :)
>Hi Franck,
>
>I prefer second solution.
>According to GPL, you are able to make a fork.
>Also you are able to make reference to new project from MMCache page.
>Thanks. Dmitry.
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: franck [mailto:franck@......]
>>Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 16:34
>>To: Dmitry Stogov
>>Subject: TurckMMCache
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Dmitry,
>>
>>Some developers made or want to make patches for turckmmcache,
>>to correct some things (especialy php5),
>>but theses developers are not in sourceforge developers
>>list for turckmmcache. You are the only one who can give
>>developer & admin access. It's begin to be a problem for
>>reactivity. Many GNU/Linux distributions include TurckMMCache
>>2.4.6 and php 4. 2.4.7-cvs contains somes bugs but support
>>php5 globaly.
>>
>>
>>
>>1. Are you agree to give administrator access for
>>TurckMMCache ? It would be great to give it to
>>Hoesh [1], who seem to be serious. Or me [2],
>>but I'm not a C developer, perhaps a potential
>>coordinator, but my english is not very good,
>>i'm just VERY interesting by the project since
>>2 years now. Anybody else you decide can be a
>>good thing too, like you want.
>>
>>2. Or perhaps, you want TurckMMCache stay as is,
>>in this case, we (developers & co) must fork
>>turckmmcache.
>>
>>You prefer solution 1 or 2 ?
>>
>>Your name will be ever on all forks of
>>TurckMMcache, I will survey this :)
>>
>>
>>Regards, Franck
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I certainly concur. I've seen a number of patches floating around to the source that's currently in CVS. I'd suggest getting the code into a VCS where it can be collaboratively modified, as well as getting a new bug tracker up so the current issues with PHP5 can be documented and resolved.
I'm a C programmer very interested in the future of this project as I'm doing quite a bit of web development using PHP5. I can provide a Subversion repository as well as Bugzilla or Mantis, work can begin, and a new name and new Sourceforge project can be registered at a later date.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
>I've seen a number of patches floating around to the source that's currently in CVS.
Interesting, where ?
>I'd suggest getting the code into a VCS where it can be collaboratively modified
Done today, all history has been kept.
>I'm a C programmer very interested in the future of this project
Great ! one more !
> I can provide a Subversion repository
Sourceforge got a CVS, not subversion. So we must stay with CVS for the day we'll go back sourceforge.
> Bugzilla or Mantis ...
The idea is not to reinvent sourceforge, we can consider a simple wiky will be a good begining, due to the very high collaborative and very simple usage.
Be patient and just wait for tomorrow. You help as a C programmer will be greatly appreciated for the project. It's seems you're member of a lots of sf projects !
The project need first good C developers/knowing zend api, and second people notice bugs to developers.
After, we will wait about the first official fork of turckmmcache annonced in a few days to see if the result is good. After, will see ...
Time to sleep now
8|
Regards, franck
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Dmitry prefer a fork of TurckMMCache rather than give an Admin access.
Let's go fork :)
>Hi Franck,
>
>I prefer second solution.
>According to GPL, you are able to make a fork.
>Also you are able to make reference to new project from MMCache page.
>Thanks. Dmitry.
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: franck [mailto:franck@......]
>>Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 16:34
>>To: Dmitry Stogov
>>Subject: TurckMMCache
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Dmitry,
>>
>>Some developers made or want to make patches for turckmmcache,
>>to correct some things (especialy php5),
>>but theses developers are not in sourceforge developers
>>list for turckmmcache. You are the only one who can give
>>developer & admin access. It's begin to be a problem for
>>reactivity. Many GNU/Linux distributions include TurckMMCache
>>2.4.6 and php 4. 2.4.7-cvs contains somes bugs but support
>>php5 globaly.
>>
>>
>>
>>1. Are you agree to give administrator access for
>>TurckMMCache ? It would be great to give it to
>>Hoesh [1], who seem to be serious. Or me [2],
>>but I'm not a C developer, perhaps a potential
>>coordinator, but my english is not very good,
>>i'm just VERY interesting by the project since
>>2 years now. Anybody else you decide can be a
>>good thing too, like you want.
>>
>>2. Or perhaps, you want TurckMMCache stay as is,
>>in this case, we (developers & co) must fork
>>turckmmcache.
>>
>>You prefer solution 1 or 2 ?
>>
>>Your name will be ever on all forks of
>>TurckMMcache, I will survey this :)
>>
>>
>>Regards, Franck
I certainly concur. I've seen a number of patches floating around to the source that's currently in CVS. I'd suggest getting the code into a VCS where it can be collaboratively modified, as well as getting a new bug tracker up so the current issues with PHP5 can be documented and resolved.
I'm a C programmer very interested in the future of this project as I'm doing quite a bit of web development using PHP5. I can provide a Subversion repository as well as Bugzilla or Mantis, work can begin, and a new name and new Sourceforge project can be registered at a later date.
>I've seen a number of patches floating around to the source that's currently in CVS.
Interesting, where ?
>I'd suggest getting the code into a VCS where it can be collaboratively modified
Done today, all history has been kept.
>I'm a C programmer very interested in the future of this project
Great ! one more !
> I can provide a Subversion repository
Sourceforge got a CVS, not subversion. So we must stay with CVS for the day we'll go back sourceforge.
> Bugzilla or Mantis ...
The idea is not to reinvent sourceforge, we can consider a simple wiky will be a good begining, due to the very high collaborative and very simple usage.
Be patient and just wait for tomorrow. You help as a C programmer will be greatly appreciated for the project. It's seems you're member of a lots of sf projects !
The project need first good C developers/knowing zend api, and second people notice bugs to developers.
After, we will wait about the first official fork of turckmmcache annonced in a few days to see if the result is good. After, will see ...
Time to sleep now
8|
Regards, franck