From: BOMB <bo...@gm...> - 2013-12-30 13:12:27
|
Hi, Rick, Thanks your warm and detailed answers. I want to setup a free ipv6 service to public, and think the tunnel broker may be a suitable approach, so I researched some transition project, it seems that most of providers use gogoserver as transition infrestucture, but I have no monty to offer the software, the only free bunnel broker is CITC tunnel broker, they use a python tool as demon broker and a kernel modul ddtb as udp-ipv6 transition, but very awful that the system must create a tunnel interface and set 2 iptables policies and 1 routing for every connection, and due to bind a port, the maximum capacity 2^16 is also a gap, so I continuously search the possible approches and found your RFC proposal, it really a talented and perfect method to resolve NAT traversal, whatever cone or symmetrical, it will bring to complexity and mistake to consider every technical details, your thinking is a perfect compromise for the transition, and in fact 2^6 ipv6 addresses is enough to many units . So next step, I'll extended the authentication based on your RFC, may be the combination of tb authentication method and your thinking is a very perfect solution to public ipv6 service, I think I will make it online soon . Thanks, Bomb 发件人: Rick van Rein 发送时间: 2013-12-30 18:30:17 收件人: tun6bed4-devel 抄送: 主题: Re: [6bed4-devel] Testbed for 6bed4 Hello Bomisme, > Do you have the help docs for setup a test bed ? > The basic testing instructions for 6bed4 are here: http://devel.0cpm.org/6bed4/ If they leave anything open, please ask for what you need to know. > Assume that: > 1, Intranet Peer -> NAT Router -> Internet -> 6bed4 Tunneling Server > That is the usual setup of a self-help client. > 2, General Intranet Peer with RADVD Solicit (not 6bed4) -> NAT Router With RADVD and 6bed4 client -> Internet -> 6bed4 Tunneling Server > With radvd, you mean the daemon that supports stateless autoconfiguration, right? The suggested use of 6bed4 is to use the last bits in support of DHCPv6. In 6bed4 v2, which is currently the only version available as an implementation, it is not possible to free the full /64 for local use, but v3 will probably... alas, see the spec and see if it suits you! http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vanrein-6bed4 is the latest/v3 spec (since I started with another name, the numbering is confusing, due to IETF numbering policy) Please note that 6bed4 is undergoing a final transition (into a textually improved spec and with updated implementation) before I submit it to the RFC Editor, and that this has not been implemented in software yet -- which is the main reason for the wait. The new 6bed4 only requires a well-known /32 and a fixed UDP port, so it treads much lighter on Internet infrastructure. This is a clear desire in the community ;-) -Rick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ tun6bed4-devel mailing list tun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tun6bed4-devel |