Menu
▾
▴
treebase-devel
|
From: Rutger V. <rut...@gm...> - 2009-05-27 21:53:43
|
Hi, I committed the source code to our sourceforge svn repository. I guess the next step is to (re-)configure our IDEs and the publish routine on 8ball and we're good to go. Rutger -- Dr. Rutger A. Vos Department of zoology University of British Columbia http://www.nexml.org http://rutgervos.blogspot.com |
|
From: Hilmar L. <hl...@du...> - 2009-05-27 21:58:45
|
Cool! You might want to lock the now former repository just to prevent any inadvertent commits to the wrong place. -hilmar On May 27, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Rutger Vos wrote: > Hi, > > I committed the source code to our sourceforge svn repository. I guess > the next step is to (re-)configure our IDEs and the publish routine on > 8ball and we're good to go. > > Rutger > > -- > Dr. Rutger A. Vos > Department of zoology > University of British Columbia > http://www.nexml.org > http://rutgervos.blogspot.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity > professionals. Meet > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & > iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like > Barbarian > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com > _______________________________________________ > Treebase-devel mailing list > Tre...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel -- =========================================================== : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu : =========================================================== |
|
From: Rutger V. <rut...@gm...> - 2009-05-27 22:00:29
|
Ah, erm, I suppose this involves asking for favours from SDSC? On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Hilmar Lapp <hl...@du...> wrote: > Cool! You might want to lock the now former repository just to prevent any > inadvertent commits to the wrong place. > > -hilmar > > On May 27, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Rutger Vos wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I committed the source code to our sourceforge svn repository. I guess >> the next step is to (re-)configure our IDEs and the publish routine on >> 8ball and we're good to go. >> >> Rutger >> >> -- >> Dr. Rutger A. Vos >> Department of zoology >> University of British Columbia >> http://www.nexml.org >> http://rutgervos.blogspot.com >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT >> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. >> Meet >> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & >> iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like >> Barbarian >> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com >> _______________________________________________ >> Treebase-devel mailing list >> Tre...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel > > -- > =========================================================== > : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu : > =========================================================== > > > > > -- Dr. Rutger A. Vos Department of zoology University of British Columbia http://www.nexml.org http://rutgervos.blogspot.com |
|
From: Hilmar L. <hl...@du...> - 2009-05-27 22:12:38
|
To do it cleanly, I suppose yes (i.e., if they control your SVN repository - a simple pre-commit hook rejecting all commits would preserve the current state of the code yet disallows all changes). But you can always resort to just moving the entire code base to some new path with obvious semantics (e.g., /MOVED-TO-SF.NET-DO-NOT- CHANGE), which should make any subsequent commit against the current path fail. Just be creative :-) -hilmar On May 27, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Rutger Vos wrote: > Ah, erm, I suppose this involves asking for favours from SDSC? > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Hilmar Lapp <hl...@du...> wrote: >> Cool! You might want to lock the now former repository just to >> prevent any >> inadvertent commits to the wrong place. >> >> -hilmar >> >> On May 27, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Rutger Vos wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I committed the source code to our sourceforge svn repository. I >>> guess >>> the next step is to (re-)configure our IDEs and the publish >>> routine on >>> 8ball and we're good to go. >>> >>> Rutger >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Rutger A. Vos >>> Department of zoology >>> University of British Columbia >>> http://www.nexml.org >>> http://rutgervos.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT >>> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity >>> professionals. >>> Meet >>> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, >>> Processing, & >>> iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like >>> Barbarian >>> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Treebase-devel mailing list >>> Tre...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel >> >> -- >> =========================================================== >> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu : >> =========================================================== >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Dr. Rutger A. Vos > Department of zoology > University of British Columbia > http://www.nexml.org > http://rutgervos.blogspot.com -- =========================================================== : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu : =========================================================== |
|
From: Mark D. <mj...@ge...> - 2009-05-28 15:45:22
|
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:53 -0400, Rutger Vos wrote: > Hi, > > I committed the source code to our sourceforge svn repository. I guess > the next step is to (re-)configure our IDEs and the publish routine on > 8ball and we're good to go. The publish command doesn't need to change; it just does SVN checkout. It should suffice to move the old sandbox aside and check out a new one from SF into the same place. I'll do this. |
|
From: Mark D. <mj...@ge...> - 2009-05-28 16:07:52
|
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:45 -0400, Mark Dominus wrote: > It should suffice to move the old sandbox aside and check out a new one > from SF into the same place. I'll do this. Done. (Notice "revision 3" at the bottom of the page instead of "revision 6504".) |
|
From: Mark D. <mj...@ge...> - 2009-05-28 16:00:43
|
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:53 -0400, Rutger Vos wrote: > Hi, > > I committed the source code to our sourceforge svn repository. It seems that some files may be missing. For example, trunk/pom.xml is not in the SF SVN repository. I will correct these as I notice them, but perhaps you could do a more systematic check for missing files and check in anything else that might be missing. |
|
From: Mark D. <mj...@ge...> - 2009-05-28 16:42:32
|
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 12:00 -0400, Mark Dominus wrote: > It seems that some files may be missing. I notice you got rid of the top-level /mjd directory, which I think was a good move, and also the top-level /doc directory. Getting rid of the stuff in /doc doesn't bother me at all, but I wanted to check to make sure you had done it on purpose. |
|
From: Rutger V. <rut...@gm...> - 2009-05-28 16:07:11
|
Mmmm... I did a clean checkout from SDSC, blew away the .svn folders and committed the result to sf.net. The big idea was that this way I wouldn't accidentally add files that are in our local projects *but not under svn*, such as the .properties file that contains the passwords. Is it possible that the pom.xml belongs in that category? On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Mark Dominus <mj...@ge...> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:53 -0400, Rutger Vos wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I committed the source code to our sourceforge svn repository. > > It seems that some files may be missing. For example, trunk/pom.xml is > not in the SF SVN repository. I will correct these as I notice them, > but perhaps you could do a more systematic check for missing files and > check in anything else that might be missing. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & > iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com > _______________________________________________ > Treebase-devel mailing list > Tre...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel > -- Dr. Rutger A. Vos Department of zoology University of British Columbia http://www.nexml.org http://rutgervos.blogspot.com |
|
From: Mark D. <mj...@ge...> - 2009-05-28 16:13:47
|
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 12:07 -0400, Rutger Vos wrote: > Is it possible that the pom.xml belongs in that category? No. In fact, you were the last person to commit it. -- Mark Jason Dominus mj...@ge... Penn Genome Frontiers Institute +1 215 573 5387 |
|
From: Rutger V. <rut...@gm...> - 2009-05-28 16:17:53
|
Mmmm... OK, that's odd. What, do you think, is the exhaustive way to do this? Merge my eclipse project based on the sdsc code base *sans .svn folders* with the sf.net version, then check individually for each file not under svn whether it should be? On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Mark Dominus <mj...@ge...> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 12:07 -0400, Rutger Vos wrote: >> Is it possible that the pom.xml belongs in that category? > > No. In fact, you were the last person to commit it. > > -- > Mark Jason Dominus mj...@ge... > Penn Genome Frontiers Institute +1 215 573 5387 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & > iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com > _______________________________________________ > Treebase-devel mailing list > Tre...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel > -- Dr. Rutger A. Vos Department of zoology University of British Columbia http://www.nexml.org http://rutgervos.blogspot.com |
|
From: Mark D. <mj...@ge...> - 2009-05-28 16:24:26
|
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 12:17 -0400, Rutger Vos wrote: > What, do you think, is the exhaustive way to > do this? How about "svn ls -R" in the old repository, "svn ls -R -r 1" in the new repository, and then diff the two outputs? Or to be really thorough you could check out complete fresh copies of both repositories and then "diff -R" the two directories; they should be identical. |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X