From: Rutger V. <rut...@gm...> - 2014-10-23 09:19:14
|
Hi all, here a quick status update on TreeBASE hosting at Naturalis, with some pressing questions from our ICT dept at the bottom: The "project bureau" of the Naturalis ICT department has considered hosting TreeBASE and would be keen to do this, though they are aware that they are not the only candidates for this so they are now developing a plan for what hosting would mean and whether they can offer something that we can all commit to with confidence. The basic idea is that they would replicate as much as possible the practices and configuration that were developed at NESCent, but folding it a bit more into the ICT departments workflow and way of doing this. This might include things such as: - move code to github - decide whether to adopt Jenkins (or something else) - expand automated provisioning of dev/stage/prod servers using puppet They want to make very, very specific agreements about who's responsible for what. As far as they've been able to tell, this includes the following topics, with they responsibility between parentheses: - the content, i.e. editing and reviewing submissions (presumably, they have nothing to do with that) - the code, i.e. bug fixes and feature additions (again, they don't plan to do anything with that) - testing, i.e. do bug fixes and enhancements work as intended on the staging server (presumably this is shared, e.g. they deploy, others test & verify) - system/db administration, i.e. checking performance and tuning it (to the extent that this doesn't involve code modifications they would do this) *And they would like further clarification on a number of issues - so the following are important and require your feedback:* *- do they need to worry about copyright issues w.r.t. the abstracts in the database?* *- what exactly does the annual growth rate (60%/pa) refer to?* *- what's in place in terms of automation (e.g. continuous integration) and how would they best be able to copy this?* Thanks, Rutger |